awwducks
---
EnergySavvy is on a mission to help solve one of the world’s biggest challenges: energy. We work with electric and gas providers across the country to improve the way consumers and businesses interact with energy at work and in their homes, and better serve their customers.
To give you a sense of our favorite technologies, our team works with: Flask, Python, React, Git, and PostgreSQL, but we don’t expect you to walk in the door knowing them.
We’re hiring for a few key roles in our Cambridge and Seattle offices:
--- Seattle: ---
Software Engineer: http://bit.ly/2pBy6yQ
Client Engagement Professional: http://bit.ly/2pBxPfi
--- Cambridge: ---
Software Engineer: http://bit.ly/2qmpUTQ
--- Flexible Location: ---
Director of Client Solutions: http://bit.ly/2oRoW2b
---
Email christine at energysavvy.com to find out more or apply online.
Cho Chi-Hun Competing with 'Japanese AlphaGo'
Worldwide shortage of Go equipment in wake of AlphaGo
I'm not sure how to format a block quote without it.
Edit: Well, just added newlines. Seems to look ok.
The book starts on ladders, a pretty basic concept that I teach to beginners within 15 minutes or so of learning the rules. [1]
Still on ladders? Ridiculous! Even looking at this page is beneath me.
Yes, but even if you feel you are being cheated, read on a little further.
Don't forget the fundamentals. Our study begins with ladders.
[0]: http://www.gobooks.info/g28.htmlOne of the things I did want to see was how AlphaGo would fare in a blitz situation (i.e. really short timers).
According to the last press conference, it was apparently strong amateur games from the internet that it used to train with. Afterwards, it just played itself, as you mentioned.
http://playgo.to/iwtg/en/count.html
The whole series isn't bad if you're interested in other aspects of the game.
Game 1: Lee Sedol does not know what to expect. He plays testing moves early and gets punished, losing the game decisively.
Game 2: Lee Sedol calms down and plays as if he is playing a strong opponent. He plays strong moves waiting for AlphaGo to make a mistake. AlphaGo responds calmly keeping a lead throughout the game.
Game 3: Lee Sedol plans a strategy to attack white from the start, but fails. He valiantly plays to the end, creating an interesting position after the game was decided deep in AlphaGo's territory.
Game 4: Lee Sedol focuses on territory early on, deciding to replicate his late game invasion from the previous game, but on a larger scale earlier in the game. He wins this game with a brilliant play at move 78.
Game 5: The prevailing opinion ahead of the game was that AlphaGo was weak at attacking groups. Lee Sedol crafted an excellent early game to try to exploit that weakness.
Tweet from Hassabis midgame [0]:
#AlphaGo made a bad mistake early in the game (it didnt know a known tesuji) but now it is trying hard to claw it back... nail-biting.
After a back and forth late middlegame, Myungwan Kim 9p felt there were many missed chances that caused Lee Sedol to ultimately lose the game by resignation in the late endgame behind a few points.Ultimately, this match was a momentous occasion for both the AI and the go community. My big curiosity is how much more AlphaGo can improve. Did Lee Sedol find fundamental weaknesses that will continue to crop up regardless of how many CPUs you throw at it? How would AlphaGo fare against opponents with different styles? Perhaps Park Jungwhan, a player with a stronger opening game. Or perhaps Ke Jie, the top ranked player in the world [1], given that they'd have access to the game records of Lee Sedol?
I also wonder if the quick succession of these games on an almost back-to-back game schedule played a role in Lee Sedol's loss.
Myungwan Kim felt that if Lee Sedol were to play AlphaGo once more, the game would be a coinflip since AlphaGo is likely stronger, but would never fix its weakness between games.
[0]: https://twitter.com/demishassabis/status/709635140020871168
AlphaGo given honorary 9 dan rank by Korean Baduk Association
Isn't that the nature of human endeavor? Always looking for the next challenge?
I wonder if Lee Sedol can find a way to replicate that in Game 5.
[0]: https://twitter.com/demishassabis/status/708928006400581632
The niggling thought in my mind was that AlphaGo's strength is built on human strength.
I recall Andrew mentioning that Myungwan will be back to comment games 4 and 5?
As a 3d amateur, I'm really curious about when he resigned. It really seemed like he was playing the position out to go for the win (or perhaps to see how AlphaGo would fare in ko). It didn't look like he was searching for a place to resign.
I definitely did not expect that.
Major credit to Lee Sedol for toughing that out and playing as long as he did. It was dramatic to watch as he played a bunch of his moves with only 1 or 2 seconds left on the clock.
He inevitably asks questions you want Myungwan to answer.
For the folks who aren't as familiar with the game, how did you find the commentary (for any channel)? What would you be interested in hearing for events like these?
https://www.kccla.org/english/calendar_view.asp?cid=4020&imo...
The second game should be a doozy since Lee Sedol will definitely know what to expect and come in full force!
https://gaming.youtube.com/watch?v=YZPKR7HzM_s
No one can believe it. Myungwan Kim 9p says it's likely Lee Sedol feels like he could have won. He also says Alpha Go is likely stronger than he is.