asoylu

> In many places that is not a question, but just a rhetoric question that means 'doing it by hand is wrong'

I hate it when people psychanalyse my question to find hidden meanings instead of giving a straight yes/no/dunno answer. Like "What let you to ask this question? I assume you actually want to ask B." Then they give you a long speech on completely irrelevant or obvious facts.

This works when list nodes are allocated subsequently without other irrelevant allocations intervened. If your case doesn't fit this constraint, value speculation doesn't seem to work. Any comments?

He actually warned the public in his Farm Bank's sausage commercial with a motto like "Sausage that fits the bill" (in Turkish, fallic innuendo)

This title reflects subject of the paper by self-examplification, almost in an autological manner.

They will not need when there is no human employee remained:)

Reminded me Tom Scott's video on his survey with similar question and interesting interpretations: https://youtu.be/dcuNq3Bw9Xs

Is that only me who finds Latinated sentences easier to read? I think so because "pure English" sentences contain phrasal verbs which are harder for me, also in sentences with short words information flows so fast that I cannot follow. Additionally, when speaking, long words are easier to recognize and short words are more prone to miss when mispronounced.