News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

arekp

Re:The Highest Form of Flattery on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @06:17AM (#5442209)
Did you contact them before smearing them in public?
Re:Show HN: 5000 best porn videos on Monday March 25, 2013 @01:32PM (#5438330)
I submitted all other links before to HN (5000 best movies, books, websites, etc.)
Re:Netflix no longer issuing new API keys on Saturday March 09, 2013 @04:49AM (#5347966)
I had a small feature - importing ratings from Netflix in my (now abandoned) application "Movie Galaxy" http://5000best.com/movie-galaxy/
Re:How are websites making money? on Thursday February 21, 2013 @05:24AM (#5256623)
It lists only websites in English, and the ranking is US-centric.
Re:How are websites making money? on Wednesday February 20, 2013 @02:33PM (#5252697)
It's interesting to compare the findings with website popularity: http://5000best.com/websites/
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @05:53PM (#4945270)
Yea, that Excel-table-like design probably breaks all design rules. It surprises me most when I occasionally see design professionals complementing it. I am rather a backend programmer and I have no illusions.

But even the Hacker News audience does not have enough geekiness to understand my previous attempt at a movie recommender system: http://5000best.com/movie-galaxy/

Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @05:12PM (#4945118)
The website should withstand several times larger traffic than the HN frontpage effect. I am not sure about the reddit effect.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @04:47PM (#4945040)
I do not know when I will have time to experiment more with the website, but volunteers are always welcome.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @03:29PM (#4944625)
I have to tune that one. Violence and blood alone should not indicate a horror.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @03:20PM (#4944577)
Thank you. I was in top 50 in the Netflix Prize and wrote a book about recommender systems (http://arek-paterek.com/book/) if someone is interested how the bread is made.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @03:18PM (#4944563)
Score is different in each of the 55 rankings. I do not know if this is clear in the interface, but "Law" is one of the rankings, not a filter.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @03:13PM (#4944527)
Yes, the interface became a little complicated. The previous version was more accessible for a casual user, for example the following article about the website was received pretty enthusiastically (retweeted about 1000 times) http://gigazine.net/news/20121012-5000-best-movies/

I guess the right way to fix it is to hide some features and add a tutorial.

Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @02:43PM (#4944357)
Great feedback. I see I should do it this way.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @02:27PM (#4944254)
Thanks. We'll see. Each feature costs developer's time.

Edit: the stack is G-WAN and everything is written in plain ANSI C. I wrote my own HTTP servers in C/C++ for my previous websites, but this time I tried G-WAN. I think it saved me one week of work or two.

The website is running on the cheapest virtual dedicated server from 1&1 with 25% of one processor time. The total cost is less than $10 monthly.

Re:Scientists See Promise in Deep-Learning Programs on Sunday November 25, 2012 @09:01AM (#4828157)
The Netflix Prize winners had a few RBM models that used the dates.

Regarding the DBM - I also tried to use more than one layer, and without success. I tried out 3-layer and 4-layer autoencoders (can be called 1.5-layer and 2-layer DBM), with initialization by stacked RBMs or without it. It did not work well probably because: a) the model was inaccurate, and b) the learning method proposed for DBM was not completely correct. Intuitively, the right DBM-like model with the right learning method should have a chance to improve something on the Netflix task.

I found some improvement though (rather learning time than accuracy) in the standard RBMs. Instead of using CD, I split the weights into two sets, creating a directed RBM version. The "up" weights from the visible nodes to hidden are learned with CD with T=1. The "down" weights are learned to best fit the visible nodes, using the hidden nodes as predictors. The hidden nodes generated by CD T=1 are good enough, and we do not need additional iterations with increased T.

Re:If malloc fails, it's not for the obvious reason on Saturday November 03, 2012 @05:58PM (#4738050)
Extending my comment, I am almost sure that passing a small negative argument (which is converted to a large positive number) causes malloc to return NULL on Linux.
Re:If malloc fails, it's not for the obvious reason on Saturday November 03, 2012 @04:53AM (#4736233)
False. malloc() fails with a negative argument.
Re:Automatic Generation of Regular Expressions from Examples on Monday October 22, 2012 @03:03PM (#4684847)
This makes me think. In 2012 people still think that genetic programming, a numerical optimization technique (and not the most efficient one), magically solves random machine learning problems.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Saturday September 22, 2012 @08:22AM (#4557710)
It is there, but undocumented and the syntax may change in the future. http://5000best.com/movies?g2=on&y0=1990&y1=2005&...
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Saturday September 22, 2012 @06:10AM (#4557534)
I had to choose one name per movie. If a movie is based on a novel, I believe the author of the novel should be credited in the first place. Usually the script degrades the quality of the novel.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Saturday September 22, 2012 @04:53AM (#4557459)
It is doable, but because these companies compete with each other, would they all be happy seeing their streaming links next to each other? They can cut off access to their APIs at any time.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Friday September 21, 2012 @05:31PM (#4555935)
Thanks for the suggestions and for the bug report.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Friday September 21, 2012 @05:13PM (#4555836)
The clustering was based on the regularized SVD / matrix factorization results. Details in my e-book.
Re:Show HN: 5000 best movies on Friday September 21, 2012 @05:07PM (#4555797)
So which taste the best? I started in the Netflix Prize, and for me a movie taste is a point in a 32-dimensional space or 64-dimensional space. Which point is better than the others?

Older ยป