anon4728
Add some nixie tubes, and you have a steampunk wet dream.
Find ye parts:
As the basecamp folks said, "Fire the workaholics."
* Do take Metformin.
* Consume sufficient Omega-3 (many fish-oil capsules or fewer small, oily fish).
* When > 50, take either aspirin or triflusal.
* Exercise to minimize resting heart rate.
* Meditate.
* Use sunscreen to protect against UVA.
* Don't smoke or chew tobacco.
* Minimize inflammation and inflammatory processes.
* Don't live next to a highway or urban pollution.
* Don't be poor.
* Resolve depression or sleep apnea.
* Don't eat meat, eat mostly plants. (Raw vegan is a bit hipster extreme.)
The core, unscalable challenge is finding smart and motivated investors whom can add value.
For example, take Raj Parekh:
- nice guy
- hustler's hustler
- can act as anything from investor to sales to VP, without getting too bossy, just unblocks problems and moves forward
- knows the enteprise space
That's the ideal investor:
competent, helpful, humane, relentlessly resourceful and generally willing to roll up sleeves as an equal part of the team.
Creating an "open platform" encourages device makers to polish it only for their needs but not upstream features and fixes to competitors (OS fragmentation) and let multiple, insecure versions run forever that rarely get updated (legacy fragmentation). Plus, Linux security is usually an oxymoron which Fuchsia may address. If Google wants their platform to survive, they're going to have to require approval for apps and devices, and stipulate things like UX usability and mandatory OS patches.
PS: There are thousands of servers run by handset manufacturers and telcos that are required for some features of mobile devices to work at all. For example, Motorola Mobility smartphones' depended on their own servers for many social media features to work. These backend-heavy designs are supremely easy to brick, disconnect and invade privacy of users, en masse, for profit and for government spying.
- Worker bees will stay because they're clueless and don't have the initiative to keep moving.
- Pressure from on high to fudge performance reviews downwards to "save the company money." (At where my mom worked, a middle manager blanket reduced all subordinate reviews down because BS: "people are overly generous.")
If you want least turnover / most morale / most productivity, pick people whom can grow the most and grow them until they no longer can keep up or find something else. Develop people (training, mentoring, promotions, bonuses, raises, perks, etc.), don't just consume them as static widgets to fill a hole.