ankleturtle
Nope, that's a bus factor of one. I'm done.
See: https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/19/apple_m1_high_bandwid...
> The SoC has access to 16GB of unified memory. This uses 4266 MT/s LPDDR4X SDRAM (synchronous DRAM) and is mounted with the SoC using a system-in-package (SiP) design. A SoC is built from a single semiconductor die whereas a SiP connects two or more semiconductor dies.
https://www.google.com/maps/search/deck+builder+chicago/
The a large percentage of these listings are fake. They're run by a single company who has blanketed Chicago with "lead generation" listings across several local service business industries.
You can report them to Google. Nothing gets done most of the time. Redressal form? Same thing. Escalate on the forums? Same result.
And this is only one such lead gen network that I know of. Google doesn't care.
Matt responds: > WP Engine is a “competitor”, but so is every other web host in the world. Automattic and WordPress.org have had good relations with all the others for 21 years. WordPress.org recommends a number of hosts.
It seems Matt is forgetting his "friendly" spat with GoDaddy a few years ago.
Matt continues: > His criticism of certain practices focuses on maintaining the platform’s integrity and open-source commitment to ensure the community can grow further with sustainable investments.
Let's assume this is all true. It doesn't change the fact that he's attacking a direct competitor.
Matt continues: > Silver Lake is far wealthier than Matt or Automattic.
This is how you know that Matt wrote the response. It's the same ego defending behavior that he used when responding to DHH.
Matt is very, very bad at PR. It's really time he learns that and lets others take over those roles. And it's time he learns to shut up. He hurts more than he helps.
Matt already knows this.[0]
photomatt: "It is also unethical to publicly speculate on my medication, medical state, or mental health."
I consider artificial scarcity to be an unethical practice. It's literally lying. It uses fake timers to pressure people into buying or fake limits to suggest that they need to buy now. Does it work? Absolutely. Is it ethical? Not a chance.
> The Foundation also licensed the name to the website WordPress.org, which facilitates widespread access to WordPress-related software at no charge.
The Wordpress Foundation is a non-profit legal entity with a tiny budget. It appears the only thing it does is serve as a holding entity for the trademarks and the for-profit company than operates the WordCamp conferences.
I suspect that Automattic is the one who foots the bill for the infrastructure behind Wordpress.org, but that's not clear.
Matt talks about transparency, but how everything operates is a muddled mess.
"Due to recent events in the WordPress ecosystem, WP Engine employees have been blocked from accessing WordPress.org. This means the ACF team is unable to deploy updates to the free version of ACF hosted on WordPress.org and users running this plugin on their sites were removed from the ability to automatically update to newer versions."[0]
Matt really meant it when he said he was going nuclear.
0. https://www.advancedcustomfields.com/blog/installing-and-upg...
He also demanded auditing of WP Engine by their direct competitor, Automattic.
0. https://automattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/term-sheet...
0. https://www.therepository.email/mullenweg-threatens-corporat...
This is definitely not about subpar hosting for Matt.
0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endurance_International_Group 1. https://wptavern.com/matt-mullenwegs-ecosystem-thinking-for-... 2. https://wptavern.com/matt-mullenweg-identifies-godaddy-as-a-...
Revenue is a red herring. It is not an appropriate measure to determine if and how much one should contribute to an open source project.
Instead, we should measure the need to contribute by the burden one places on the project.
Do you request features or bug fixes? Contribute appropriately.
Do you request support? Contribute appropriately.
Do you simply copy, install, and run the existing software? No need to contribute.