andersentobias
Clever use of language to check one's thinking
'God' is the mean opinion of your tribe
Tech: Python, Django, React
I am primarily a Python/Django backend developer (6 years experience). I also have experience writing C++/Qt code (4 years at a Swedish company), and consider myself a well-rounded software developer.
Web: https://andersentobias.com
Email: [email protected]
Fully systematic traders exist and make money. Efficient Markets Theory says they shouldn't, but they do anyway. EMH is probably written under stricter/ideal conditions though.
If one wants to take a systematic/technical analysis approach though, I would look at the entire universe of stocks, whereas use a fundamental approach in individual stocks.
But yeah. I'm just an amature. What do I know.
Because I always discount with the rate I can borrow money at, right?
It vaguely seems like there is some opportunity cost argument to be made here...? Maybe?
How large % of the ADHD population could be fixed environmentally, e.g. by just going to the damn gym? How much can be attributed to our modern lifestyles?
ADHD exists, but to say that there's something wrong with "the system" just because 100% of people in society don't take it as a serious diagnosis is a big stretch.
Another big stretch is comparing ADHD with type 1 diabetes. Come on...
Also a quotation link would be appreciated.
Isn't this very data-centric in nature?
What currencies are referred to here?
It seems to me that you want to apply memorization techniques, or even high school paper writing techniques, to material highly conceptual in nature...
I don't think that's appropriate.
I have heard this repeated from so many vegans / animal activists at this point, including my own sister. Where did you get it from? Who is the original author? I am seriously asking.
An argument involving only my individual health (I am into fitness stuff) plus effect on the environment - repeated enough times - would sway me.
To be completely honest: I do not appreciate being told that I am an immoral human being for X (X = eating meat).
Been told that too many times already during my lifetime. It is a cultural constant. That formula is just too tiresome to hear yet again at this point.
20-hour Auto Engineering Video Course from How a Car Works
Russia is not fighting the US military, but they are fighting US military vehicles etc
With that said, I like the idea of cryptocurrencies simply because they are punk as f*ck, and I'd like whatever leadership in charge to know that they do not have absolute power to run anyone else's life.
Apart from magic internet money, I cannot figure out any other way in which to "make myself heard".
With every indirection the gov't adds through decision taken by ombudsman/committee, the more power asymmetry is added which just fuels my sense of a system driven by amoral technocrats.
Like, if you studied math or CS, or studied to become a MD... Maybe you're prone to take yourself to seriously because of it. There is and will always be a feedback loop in society because we are all humans and always seeking attachment (in the psychological sense) to other humans.
I have self-worth because I do not try to justify it relative to something I do not control, like a Ivy Leage graduating class, FAANG, or whatever, but instead of accepting myself as I am.
Thoughts?
When categorizing notes to be remembered, I think it's good to think in terms of memory retreival, not memory storage. In other words, not to become an "archiever", because you probably want to evolve your ideas by linking them together in your own unique way -- unique as dicated by your problem at hand plus your own idiosyncratic experiences.
"How to take smart notes" by Sönke Ahrens is a great book on this topic, admittedly more oriented towards a Zettelkasten/Obsidian workflow.
I guess all sample sizes of weed smokers are small in public health studies.
As an aside, my father was an alcoholic and a pathetic loser indulging in as much alcohol as self-pity. I am not defending excessive alcohol consumption.
My point is: Even if you think weed is relatively better than alcohol from a big picture societal POV (we can agree to disagree here), don't underestimate the bad effects of weed. Don't be a weed-smoking loser just because it's legal.
You have one body. Take care of it.
Cannabis on the other hand...
Now the govt are "refunding" the depositors, but not the shareholders.
In what way is this a bad thing, if someone is willing to play the devil's advocate for a second?
Either these high-profile investors only want to save their own asses OR they ostensibly have a bigger plan to rescue the banking system in some unbeknownst way.
I'm interested in hearing the rationale for the latter.