amencarini
Re:Elm from a Business Perspective
on Thursday November 10, 2016 @05:10AM (#12919148)
This typeclasses discussion reminds me a lot of complaints about Go's lack of generics. Even without this "glaring shortcoming" Go became the de facto winner in the ops space, by staying a simple language with a smaller learning surface. Elm could be walking down the same route.
Personally I find composability under The Elm Architecture more of an issue than pure language abstractions.
Re:Hello Ruby – Almost there
on Monday August 03, 2015 @05:32AM (#9994663)
We are talking about a children's book, I don't think a reader of this book will have to maintain large codebases for a job anytime soon.
Incidentally, Ruby is great for beginners thanks to its expressiveness.
Re:Handling 1M Requests per Minute with Go
on Tuesday July 07, 2015 @12:32PM (#9846463)
A better tool such as?
Re:MacKeeper 0-day flaw more than 20M users affected
on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @06:11AM (#9537874)
Why am I not surprised that a software mainly famous because of its pop-up ads is not the most reliable thing ever?
Re:Why Tech Startups Should Look at Go
on Thursday January 15, 2015 @10:05AM (#8892785)
The Iron.io blogpost was what got me looking into Go. As a Rubyist it was quite eye-opening!
Re:Help the Gnome Foundation Defend the Gnome Trademark Against Groupon
on Tuesday November 11, 2014 @04:23AM (#8589024)
It must feel good to build a business on open source software and then try to kill open source software. Way to go, Groupon!