Ask HN: How to keep your product from fading into obscurity
As I can see, the new SaaS products or apps are launching at an overwhelming pace, making it nearly impossible for new products to stand out. Is there any solution to this problem?
The weird bit isn’t that a scraper site exists, it’s that Google can’t do the obvious graph join: query == project name, #1 result is the repo, repo declares Homepage = X, yet Google still boosts an imposter domain. That’s not “SEO”, that’s the ranking system refusing to treat maintainer-declared canonical as a strong signal. Early domain squatters get to “set the default” purely by being first, then they can flip the content later once trust is baked in.
People keep saying “tell users to bookmark the real URL” like that scales. Most people will click the second link and assume it’s official. If Google can’t solve this class of problem, their “AI answers” are going to be a bigger mess than blue links ever were.
What helped wasn’t the role shift, but dialing the intensity way down. Took a year doing part-time contract work, no Jira tickets. I know a few folks who leaned into teaching, some into small business stuff—bike repair, roasting coffee, etc. None of them are making FAANG money, but they seem… less fried.
If you’ve got savings and no urgent obligations, might be worth treating this as a decompression window instead of a pivot. Let your brain deflate a bit before deciding what’s next.
A lot of people still think moats are about features. They’re not anymore. Features are cheap now. Execution and distribution are the real bottlenecks.
Big companies can copy your product, but they usually won’t copy: – your speed early on – your willingness to serve a tiny, unsexy niche – your ability to change direction without internal politics
In practice, most startups don’t die because a big company copied them. They die because they never found real users who cared enough to pay.
The moat today often looks like: – deep understanding of a specific workflow or pain point – trust with a narrow audience – compounding advantages (data, habits, integrations, community)
If your plan is “build something cool and hope it sticks”, it’s probably not worth it. If your plan is “solve a painful problem for a very specific group, then expand”, it still is.
Curious how people here think about moats post-AI. Are we underestimating distribution, or overestimating defensibility?
As I can see, the new SaaS products or apps are launching at an overwhelming pace, making it nearly impossible for new products to stand out. Is there any solution to this problem?
https://github.com/politehq/office2pdf-sdks
We’ve open-sourced the official SDKs for the Office2PDF API.The Node.js SDK is available today, with Python, Go, and Java/Kotlin SDKs planned next.Feedback and contributions are welcome.
Hi HN,We’re building PoliteHub (https://politehub.com), an AI-first team messaging tool for small and growing teams.Like many teams here, we used Slack daily. Over time, two things became increasingly painful for us:1. Pricing: Per-seat pricing punishes growing teams. 2. AI tools are fragmented — chat in Slack, thinking in ChatGPT, docs elsewherePoliteHub is our attempt to fix this by making AI...
I am getting ready to launch a product that lets people chat in groups and focuses on work and workspace collaboration.Like Slack and Discord, the pre-preview version will not have all the features they do. For now, it will only have text chat. The difference is that it costs less and makes the most of AI's presence and support in the workflow. I’m a fan of Slack, but honestly, its pricing is a...