alderz
Google's new color scheme for Maps has been spotted in the wild
Lessons at Life’s Midpoint
Four Pests campaign – and the extermination of sparrows in China
Over 3M People Took This Course on Happiness. Here’s What Some Learned
Hexagonal tiling of the two-dimensional sphere (2015)
Minicourse on Technical Writing – By Knuth, Larrabee, and Roberts (1989) [pdf]
Fix the Machine, Not the Person (2012)
Top Latex Fonts
The web would look much more beautiful with proper justification. It's a pity technology is not there yet. TeX solved the problem for DVI/PDFs long ago, so maybe we should start blogging on PDFs!
Ask HN: Which PDF reader do you use on Linux?
I read a lot of PDFs, and I cannot find a good reader on Linux. Evince does not support tabs and has no history navigation (back/forward). Qpdfviewer does have those features, but lacks proper text selection. Okular requires a big installation and KDE libraries, which are fine if you use KDE, but I don't. There are many other minimal readers, but they are too basic for my needs. Session...
I do not find it especially good for commutative diagrams, though. I usually type tikz-cd code for those cases.
If You're Often Angry or Irritable, You May Be Depressed (2019)
If you enjoyed the post, and the author's website, be sure to read some of his books too!
> Theorem: No AI will bother after hacking its own reward function.
and then goes on:
> The picture [263] is that once the AI has figured out the philosophy of the “Dude” in the Cohen brothers movie Lebowski, also repeated mischiefs does not bother it and it “goes bowling”. Objections are brushed away with “Well, this is your, like, opinion, man”. Two examples of human super intelligent units who have succeeded to hack their own reward function are Alexander Grothendieck or Grigori Perelman.
Grothendieck abandoned the mathematical community after modernizing an entire field and eventually secluded himself in France. He is considered one of the greatest mathematicians https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Grothendieck#Retirem...
Crisis mode: potential flaw in PhD thesis two weeks before deadline
I would like to have a tree view where I can see all the files at a glance, and, more importantly, switch back a forth between them. I find it hard to follow the code in Github's UX.
Also, Fisheye/Crucible gives you more flexibility to edit the review, by allowing you to remove files, and add or remove commits. Github PRs are based on branches, while Fisheye/Crucible code reviews are based on commits; it is an entire paradigm shift that gives the user more control. For example, I can create two separate reviews from the same branch on Crucible; that's impossible on Github.
Many high-profile projects have essays in their commits; I'm familiar with those of Go, e.g. https://github.com/golang/go/commit/5779bb4e92911271583faa13... (picked one at random).