ajroas

Jesus, i believed i opened hacker news, not bernies wet dreams diary.

Off topic. First off all, I've come here to read some hacker news. Second, im tired of these articles by self deprecating mesianic pseudo intellectuals rooting for the "end" of capitalism with a starbucks cup In the right hand and an iphone on the left hand. third, there's no "neoliberalist ideology", there's not a neoliberal manifesto or anything like that, the term was coined by a marxist (a real idiology) to excuse the faults of its own, creating an "enemy to overcome", and Keep the public fighting windmills while they strip you down from everything they want, all for the sake of 'equality", resulting in the worst tragedies the world has ever seen, poverty, hunger, and blood. Please don't let them fool you... they say "eat the rich", with hatred in their heart, not with love, and please consider, for the rest of the world, you are the rich. Once an old man said, to live in a better world, just be better yourself.

why?

So, what?...

thanks god!! , is not my area and didn't know the journal so i read it out of curiosity. it is a relief that is an hoax, if this were peer reviewed... i would be so disappointed of the human kind.

i just read hatespeech; not logical nor scientific arguments... very sad.

So, how's oracle services, technology, and prices are "new", exactly?? seriously, tell me about the convenience to hire that expensive monster over the convenient, price friendly services of amazon for startups... LOL

so, we supposed to care?

Awesome... nicely done.

There is no such thing as free service. if you want to really hide yourself. look at the tor project.

yeah, probably not the best place for that question. a good start aside from mozilla could be: http://www.w3schools.com/ happy learning.

you should know, i'm trademarking the number 0.0.3 so i ask you politely to change it... LOL

You can see like 3 different pattern at the same time (thinking as a infinite series). first, the dots, looks like the sequence 4, 1, 4, 3, ? (the number of dots apparently should be 4 or 2 depending of the reasoning). but then there's a sequence of horizontal and vertical lines, that logically should be vertical in the next. and the third is the shape, no shape where repeated previously so its probable that the next shape to be the first of the sequence. that let us B and C as good choices. personal B make me happier.