ajor
Re:Surveillance on UK council websites [pdf]
on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @11:33AM (#22248365)
Privacy Badger says that "Yellow" sites where it blocks cookies do appear to be trying to track you, but are necessary for the site to work[1]. That makes 5 trackers PB has identified on Lambeth's website.
[1] https://www.eff.org/privacybadger/faq#What-do-the-red,-yello...
Re:#include </etc/shadow>
on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @09:03AM (#21813482)
Still some workarounds to the slash-stripping:
#include "\
/etc/passwd"
program221/code.cpp:1:11: warning: backslash-newline at end of file
1 | #include "\
|
In file included from program221/code.cpp:2:
/etc/passwd:1:5: error: found ':' in nested-name-specifier, expected '::'
1 | root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
| ^
| ::
/etc/passwd:1:1: error: 'root' does not name a type
1 | root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
| ^~~~
Is it possible to restrict the compiler's access to only files in "/usr/include" instead? Seems like it'd be hard to cover every case with just pattern matching.
Re:BPF: A New Type of Software
on Tuesday December 03, 2019 @10:17AM (#21692952)
I'd also recommend looking at bpftrace[1], which provides a simple DSL specifically for writing BPF programs and attaching them to events. (Disclaimer: I started the project)
[1] https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/blob/master/docs/tutoria...
Re:BPF Performance Tools: Linux System and Application Observability
on Monday July 15, 2019 @10:23PM (#20447008)
There are still people working on packet filtering! The BPF enhancements are benefiting lots of different areas of the Linux world at the same time.
Cilium [1] is a great example of how the new capabilities of BPF can be used for more complex packet filtering, such as understanding higher level protocols.