ahulak
That said, this only makes sense if the data provided by the API is proprietary in some way. If its free or open source data, being the mcp provider likely won't provide much business value aside from the insight as to what the LLMs/users are searching for.
Not totally game changing, but a great story that can help keep you motivated!
Features can be viable startups if they provide enough value and hard enough to replicate.
We have plenty of reason to believe these vaccines will be effective with minimal adverse effects (including the relatively small study of 40k individuals).
Conversely, we have definitive proof that in the best case COVID can be asymptomatic and/or a nasty, but survivable, virus. At its worst, it kills you or leaves you with long-lasting health issues that we don't yet fully understand.
Personally, I'll take my chances with the vaccine. My biggest fear isn't adverse reactions, but rather lack of efficacy.
Assets - Liabilities = Net Worth
Equally important, is that the author of this article doesn't appear to know much about how the real estate data industry works (especially in regards to market trends and how they are used to generate the Automated Valuation Models (AVMs for short). A bit surprising given the nature of the business he is representing.
The Zestimate is one of a handful of Automated Valuation Models (AVMs in industry speak) - it's the only one with a consumer-facing brand, and as a result sees the most scrutiny despite the fact that the other AVMs on the market are the ones actually used by the banks during the appraisal process.
If you think the Zestimate is bad, you should see some of the other commercial AVMs.
The reality is that creating an automated valuation for the ~100M properties in the US is an incredibly difficult task given the availability of data (or lack thereof!). Zillow does a pretty darn good job and has a bit of a data advantage given its incredibly high coverage of for sale listings (though they lack the experience - some firms have been producting AVMs for decades!).
Another thing to note, is that AVMs (like any statistical model), usually aim for a sweet spot that covers as many homes as possible. As a result, ultra high-end properties are often incorrectly valued. E.g. that $25M mansion down the street will be very hard for the model to price. Additionally, certain luxury features, like say, a tennis court, are almost impossible to incorporate into these models on a national scale.
How do you plan on getting all of that listing data?
Otherwise, very cool idea - just trying to figure out how you plan to overcome that.
1. Mobile interface (I hate to be that guy, but this would be awesome as a native app for those travelers) 2. Widgetized! Most travel bloggers want this on their own site. 3. Ability to map out a journey (as opposed to placing destinations on a map). I think a lot of travelers really take pride in the route they take and how they get from place to place (eg a motorcycle ride down the coast of Vietnam, or a boat ride across the mediterranean, etc)
Otherwise, seems pretty cool.. definitely on par with other in browser website designers.
1) Put the courses into perspective as part of the onboarding process. Why do I need to learn HTML, CSS, JS, or Python? Most people who want to learn have no clue how everything fits together. If you can provide a high level guide as to how and why someone should work through specific codecademy courses you will likely increase satisfaction and completion of courses (just a hypothesis, but this is the most common criticism I hear).
2) I wish codecademy would cover database basics. What is SQL? How should you think about storing data? Until I started researching outside of Codecademy it hadn't even occurred to me that storing and structuring data was a huge part of creating useful applications (I was totally nontechnical). This is the largest hole in terms of actual content.
3) Your classes are already great at teaching newbies the syntax. The big missing component (as some have pointed out), is turning this syntax into real world solutions for real world problems. How do you get past this? You have to break into an area that you aren't comfortable in: Content Production. Unless you can come up with a way to show people how to create and run scripts on their local computer (or maybe a remote server?) through the browser this will continue to be a pitfall of the Codecademy experience. There is probably the potential for you to create some new software that does this (maybe a desktop app), but if you took a codeschool or treehouse approach, only for this stage of the learning, you would be able to truly offer an end to end solution. In your case video content scales just as well as the software. If you were to combine your superior browser interface with high quality video production you would be in a fantastic position to win the "Learn to code online" market. This sets you up with not only a differentiated product offering (your interface is the best), but a future revenue stream. Both of the aforementioned companies are making some serious cash... And thats without even mentioned the real juggernaut (Lynda).
Overall I love the product and think there is a lot of potential. If you have any questions or any of my points require clarification please feel free to shoot me an email (in profile).
Best of luck!
Also, transacting $5000 is good, but you probably shouldn't quit your job until you can prove that its replicable and profitable (or at least sustainable).
To be perfectly honest, your phrasing made it sound like you had generated $5k in revenue, in which case quitting would probably be a good idea. $5000 in contingent donations is a whole different animal. If I were you, I would keep working on it during nights and weekends in order to test whether it will continue to gain traction.
It makes perfect sense if you break it down over the years...
1) Spammers found out they could manipulate rankings with the meta keywords tag.. shortly after, google started to ignore these keyword tags..
2) Spammers found out they could manipulate ranking with the meta description.. shortly after, google stopped using this description to rank sites..
3) Spammers realized they could build artificial link profiles, so google had to get smarter and started incorporated social metrics and became smarter about how they attributed value to links..
4) etc etc etc
It goes on and one, but basically, the only way google will ever be able to defeat spammers is to create an algorithm that is so smart it actually understands not only what the user wants, but also all of the content in its index.. it has to go much deeper than a simple keyword match - it has to parse out the intent of the searcher as well as the meaning of its content.
Ban Software Patents in the US
Square Releases Apropos: Responsive Design Made Easy
http://public-schools.findthebest.com
Same idea, although a bit more mature in dev