ahaproudowl
The pilot turns up drunk, she turns up on time, but drunk. Do we stick to the flight deadline?
The author I think could phrase the argument better by saying a delivery date (something that is promised, based on quality) is more useful than a deadline (something demanded, regardless of quality).
Delivery dates do not preclude working hard and bring prudent, but they are not hard stops. Rather they are good estimations that can and often do shift.
Sales team needs that thing by December 1st? Don't ask for it on November 29th. Put leeway into the model by giving time for the delivery date to be missed. It's called contingency.
But, depends on your philosophy - move fast and break things,or deliver consistent quality code.
The delivery date is an estimate and the date can shift until the plane is safe to fly. The deadline for delivery is not a true deadline and the factory will only work to its safe production limit to deliver the plane.
A bad practice would be to just put the plane out on the tarmac, regardless of state.
It works to the safe productivity limit of the factory, not the arbitrary demand of the customer.
Proper safety checks wouldn't let the plane leave the ground. Delays in that critical state are inconvenient, but you accept them because the alternative is not acceptable.
We should treat software in exactly the same way, It's ready when it's ready.
The issue is the illusion of control. A bad CEO will measure the performance of his CTO by productivity alone. A good CEO will measure the CTO's output by consistently increasing quality.
This is why 'build at all costs' has cost us so much. Look at the negative effects this dog eat dog build fast, break things (including people), culture has on society.
Toxic bullshit.
I think in economies where tech is slower to adopt into the mainstream agenda, abuses like this are seen as the digital equivalent of 'reasonable force'. Where there is no existing protocol, there will be fuzzy lines and abuses in order to justify bringing criminals to justice.
Like and follow buttons affected too.
Network error on the App.
If you can see past that, you will see that Mr Musk is acting in his own interests and the interests of humanity as a whole at the same time. He is giving away the patents to help create a marketplace he can compete in, he is also giving away the patents because he feels that this will help humanity.
There is nothing wrong with either approach really, just a balance that needs to be struck between them.
This balance is what the media distorts, it creates a drama where the figurehead is 'good' or 'bad'. The truth is that no one is entirely either, but their actions can be.