1) Iran's government openly calls for the destruction of Israel.
2) They are building nukes. And to use them (see point 1)
3) In a few days, they will have them. So, if Israel waits a few days, it would be much worse.
Also, your own link cites the six day war as an example of a morally justified preemptive strike. This is very analogous.
Also, when it comes to life and death of your family, a military strike on your enemies is not something you have to think too hard about.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170809055122id_/https://learni...
tl;dr They did a qualitative survey of what other people think makes a great software engineer at Microsoft.
Their take aways:
- The ability to learn is more important than any individual technical skill
- Making good decisions is rarely discussed in the software engineering literature, but it is critical to being a great software engineer
- Software engineering is a sociotechnical undertaking
- Delivering the code is often insufficient; complex contextual technical considerations abound.
* fear of writing original ideas, both natural language and code - agree
* the inability to measure things - who said this is something that is necessary at all stages? sometimes you just need it done. when you have 1000 people teams selling to enterprises, sure. If it is you and your buddies, no need to measure, necessarily.
* preference towards bias - Why? If it works, a good engineer won't go to the newest tech/framework. They will stay with their biased favorite.
* cognitive conservatism - Disagree. See previous comment
* inability to form assertion criteria - Not exactly sure what you mean, but if you mean to reason about code and state at various points, then I agree
Just accept another person to be an adult, and help you in increasingly good ways and communicate well. Or fire them if they don't
> Maintaining Culture: As the team grows, it's vital to preserve the company culture and ensure new hires align with core values.
I honestly disagree. You should allow the culture to evolve, but make sure it doesnt evolve in a direction that is different than where your values are now.
As an analogy, if you have a child who is 3, their culture is "energy", "constant learning", and "being cute". When they are 13, they should evolve beyond #3. And, they probably should add "be social/fit in", and "do good work (on homework etc)"
If you try to keep the 13 year old on the "being cute" value, you'll miss out on a lot
And I'd argue there are many more militarily involved people in Gaza than you'd like to admit. Any random person on the street is more likely than not a sympathizer that Oct 7 was justified. On Sept 12, 2001 in the US that would be enough to call you an enemy, for sure.
It isn't about getting responses though. That is generally fine, from what I can tell.
It is more that I feel like every company wants to talk, and they want to test you, but really are not interested in hiring even if you seem like a good candidate.
E.g. they want to wait for other candidates, are slow in scheduling, have tons of required interviews where they ask similar things
I currently work for a successful but dysfunctional pre-IPO startup.I've been searching for jobs now for almost 4 months. In that time, I've had numerous interviews and calls from small startups through big companies.I just got my 3rd rejection after going through a full process. The process included 7(!) interviews for a Staff/Senior level position over a month and a half.During the first...
There will be a group of people who would not acquire the content unless it was digital. They may buy or pirate it. This is the group of interest. If more people who weren't going to get the content (b/c of lack of exposure, lack of interest, etc.) pay for it than don't pay for it, the digital venture is worthwhile (This ignores that some people who would have bought it non-digitally may pirate it, though that group is small; if you wish to support to movie by paying for it, you'll most likely do it regardless of medium)
For example: 100 people would have bought the movie if it was only physical.
100 other people will have never heard of the movie unless it is released digitally. Of these 100, 75 people buy the movie, 25 pirate it.
By listing it digitally, the publisher gets 175 people's worth of profit, and 25 people's worth of "loss". Therefore, it is worth listing digitally.
If you tell me to write it as OO as possible, then I'll do that. But if I can write it in a shorter, more efficient way using only arrays, I'll do that.