News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

adomasm3

Re: on Sunday August 11, 2024 @12:16PM (#41217225)
Recap on PFAS toxicity and can filters successfully remove both long and short-chain PFAS?
You are right - I am building a mental model along these lines:

a) compounds which induce a chemical reaction inside cells and as a result cause damage. Benzene, PFAS, phtalates, BPA etc are in this category. Size is less relevant but usually these are smaller and more reactive molecules.

b) small particulates, which are still probably much larger than those in group a). Thinking here microplastics, asbestos, PM10. These particulates are not necessarily super reactive with our cells, but they can cause problems through physical accumulation(?). So the question is: does the size of microplastic particles matter? Ie if I get 1K of 100 micron microplastic particles vs. 1K of 1 micron - does that alter my health risk?

Re:New PFAS discovered with novel testing method on Monday December 18, 2023 @01:38PM (#38686375)
great summary! I wrote a blog post focusing on DWR clothing, but ended up covering PFAS human and animal studies and concentration sampling. Overall with very similar conclusions: https://open.substack.com/pub/molecularspec/p/water-repellen...

However, if we are able to better detect them, we can build better remediation which we need.

The article briefly mentions exposure from touching (wearing) DWR clothing - appears to be 700x lower than washing.

Older »