adomasm3
Robert Kennedy Jr. despises glyphosate. How should Iowa farmers respond?
Attorney General Ken Paxton sues companies over "forever chemicals"
Does Reverse Osmosis Filtered Water Require Remineralization?
How a California county got PFAS out of its drinking water
Can We Filter PFAS Forever Chemicals from Water?
The impact of the EPAs first ever federal PFAS rule limiting forever chemicals
PFAS Analytic Tools
Phthalates, Toxic Plastic Additives, Are Everywhere: What's the Acceptable Limit
Forensic breakthrough: drugs detected on gel-lifted fingerprints
Show HN: Scout3, a field GC for chemical composition profiling
PFAS in non-stick pans: how fast does it migrate to food?
PFAS Used in Grease-Proofing Agents for Food Packaging No Longer Sold
Effects of stress on the emission of volatile organic compounds from skin
Combating olive oil fraud with nuclear innovations
Nanoplastics in water – surprisingly large amounts discovered and its not good
Massive amounts of tiny plastics found in bottled drinking water, study finds
a) compounds which induce a chemical reaction inside cells and as a result cause damage. Benzene, PFAS, phtalates, BPA etc are in this category. Size is less relevant but usually these are smaller and more reactive molecules.
b) small particulates, which are still probably much larger than those in group a). Thinking here microplastics, asbestos, PM10. These particulates are not necessarily super reactive with our cells, but they can cause problems through physical accumulation(?). So the question is: does the size of microplastic particles matter? Ie if I get 1K of 100 micron microplastic particles vs. 1K of 1 micron - does that alter my health risk?
Microplastics: How much do we consume and from which sources?
Dezeen's top product designs of 2023
However, if we are able to better detect them, we can build better remediation which we need.