aaronmarks

Doesn't say the net profits from "any sale" go to the Stellar Foundation, only the net profits from the "auction [of] a majority of [their] stellars." Presumably they could sell for profit their 1 billion stellars for profit without violating this pledge.

Feels like I've seen that logo somewhere else...

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_litovxgoHb1qz7ewm.jpg

Is it just me or was this removed from the homepage?

Very excited for the iOS version! Will install immediately

From the report: "...with capsules departing as often as every 30 seconds from each terminal and carrying 28 people each. This gives a total of 7.4 million people each way that can be transported each year on Hyperloop."

reminds me of this tweet:

"happiness is a choice," insists able-bodied, healthy, beautiful millionaire jennifer aniston in the new edition of some shit magazine

https://twitter.com/plume__/status/362631201388892160

Biz Stone also just got into the meat-substitute space, with Beyond Meat - http://www.fastcoexist.com/1680007/biz-stone-explains-why-tw... - which I can report is vegan, gluten free and delicious.

http://404.io/ redirects to bitly

Does this mean they're undervalued and it's a good time to buy Zynga?

a word

Screenshots on the homepage are a bit confusing - seems like you should be able to sign up right from the homepage, but then you have to click through.

This seems like a really valid and important point. Yet companies who do build their entire business on other companies' info / APIS (Think Greplin, Trendrr, Tweetdeck, etc.) still get tons of interest from investors. While it is easy to realize the importance of developing an independent business when commenting on HN, I think the startup community as a whole needs to start displaying this in its actions.

Once more large internet companies realize that their users (both of their services and API) are not necessarily their customers (Think Twitter's denial of new 3rd party clients), the API free-for-all which we're experiencing right now will dry up, and we'll see at least one of the companies-who-are-built-on-other-companies fail. This might be the kick in the pants that the startup community needs to realize the importance of building unique, independent businesses.

There are definitely two conflicting forces at work here - social networking making every action seem both insignificant (in comparison to the barrage of updates we receive every day) while also making almost every event quite significant (Hundreds of comments, comments on comments, etc). But one force might not necessarily prevail over the other - they can work it tandem, leading to interesting results.

One issue with jdietrich's initial comment is that his views on social networking revealing our true insignificance assume that the selves we display in the "unreal" world of social networking are, in fact, accurate representations of our "real world" selves; in reality, this is hardly the case. I know I've caught myself thinking "How will this Tweet or that FB update make me look to my friends/followers..." - hardly a parallel of how one lives and presents themselves in the unpredictable, variable real world.

This, in my mind, is the product of the conflicting forces of exaggerated significance / insignificance - the intense crafting of our online personalities. We've seen the blue marble - have realized that with all of the white noise, we must seem better, funnier, more interesting, to break through the noise. Yet at the same time we know that, should we actually get noticed, we will get noticed in a serious way - hundreds or thousands of people might see our update. The pressure is on.

As I see it, this is the product of these two conflicting forces: A high-pressure culture, a culture of scrutiny wherein every action and sentence is specifically crafted and cultivated. Orwell's 1984 comes to mind, but rather than Big Brother watching over everyone, it is the public that constantly watches each other.

A great trick I've found w/r/t your first tip (going to unproductive websites when feeling initial frustration) is to stop using the "Keep me logged in" option on those sites. If I hit a problem and habitually go to Facebook or Gmail, having that buffer layer of needing to log in makes me stop and think "Wait, I should really focus on the problem I've avoided by coming here."

I think the idea is that anyone interested enough in these companies to use this site would also be interested in / see the value in that data.

This is a great article to show business cofounders who might be reluctant to learn how to code. Wonderful evidence that even folks with 0 experience can increase their coding knowledge (and thus ability to work effectively w/ hackers) by great strides in a short 6 months.

DreamIt Ventures started in Philly and is launching in NYC this Summer. They take applicants for both startups as well as hackers interested in being matched up with a startup (Somewhat like being a Techstars "Hackstar")

Foursquare is something that became wildly popular at the same time smart phones were becoming more and more ubiquitous. It is a cool sort of "Hey check out what my new phone can do" kind of tool.

As smart phones are becoming more the standard and less the shiny-new-thing, though, Foursquare and the like are turning out to not actually provide that much value, and are losing their stickiness.

Funny how the article knocks Hunch as a startup that never works, then, in their own recommended article they link to at the bottom, call it a "Hot NYC startup you need to watch" http://www.businessinsider.com/the-25-new-york-city-startups...

For fellow NYC-ers I'd recommend this new service Fred Wilson tweeted out today, sounds pretty interesting / useful: http://www.pairupnyc.com/

Unfortunately the nation of Eritrea does not offer domains through Godaddy, and I wanted to get this up and online in a few hours.