News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

_telemachus

Re:Printable True Bugs Wait Posters on Friday January 31, 2014 @11:54AM (#7157572)
Let's assume your string struct is solid. Then does that mean you can safely use it with `printf, fprintf, sprintf` (e.g. printf("%s", string->value)? Or must you also write custom versions of those functions? How deep does this rabbit hole go?
Re:Printable True Bugs Wait Posters on Friday January 31, 2014 @10:52AM (#7157247)
Good for laughs. Thanks. Now the serious follow up: Ok, what else should someone do?

Programs (often) handle text. Apparently, that pretty much means you're fucked. So what is a reasonable way to write such programs?

Re:Printable True Bugs Wait Posters on Friday January 31, 2014 @10:51AM (#7157239)
Serious question: Aren't the C-based problems simply hidden from the programmer there? That is, the problems still exist, but you can no longer address them, qua Python, Ruby, Java programmer. That seems worse, not better.
Re:Emacs, naked on Thursday January 23, 2014 @01:15PM (#7109934)
Thanks for the tip about railwaycat's fork. Note though that before you can run:

    brew install emacs-mac
you first need to run this:

    brew tap railwaycat/emacsmacport
Otherwise, `brew` won't be aware of that version. (Whoops. Noticed just now that someone said this earlier as well. Since the comments are all spread out, I'm leaving mine in case it helps someone see the issue faster.)
Re:Say hello to offline first on Tuesday November 05, 2013 @12:50PM (#6676594)
> or sending e-mails

Better mail applications allow you to "send" the mail with no connectivity and then simply hold onto it until there's a network connection. At which point the mail is actually sent out. But for the user it's transparent. He or she hits send and (at some point), the mail goes out. I wish more phone apps did this (looking at you, Twitter).