News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

_o68p

@Dang you haven’t even protected my identity like you promised.

Why do you have such a bent against victims of sexual assault and domestic violence?

You are not applying the rules fairly and are allowing defamatory commentary that is damaging to victims of sexual assault. I won't post any further, but please remove the thread before I am forced to take legal action.
Re: on Friday January 07, 2022 @07:57PM (#29847333)
You need to leave me alone or I will call the police for harassment.

Do not contact me.

I do not wish for you to communicate with me further.

Re: on Friday January 07, 2022 @07:50PM (#29847276)
[name redacted] sexually assaulted me and emotionally abused me.

[name redacted] stalked me for weeks at my home while having me blocked which prompted me to reach out again. He clearly did not want me to move on and sent several messages stating he was in love with me but needed me to “change.”

That change was accepting verbal, emotional abuse, infidelity, and sexual assault as well as giving up all my hobbies and friendships.

The abuse was so brutal, I could not believe someone that said they loved me so profoundly would do those things to me.

Perhaps he’s found someone that’s willing to accept abuse, but that’s not what the law says.

Re: on Friday January 07, 2022 @07:42PM (#29847193)
[name redacted] sexually assaulted me and emotionally abused me.

[name redacted] stalked me for weeks at my home while having me blocked which prompted me to reach out again from a different number.

He clearly did not want me to move on and sent several messages stating he was in love with me but needed me to “change.”

That change was accepting verbal, emotional abuse, infidelity, and sexual assault as well as giving up all my hobbies and friendships.

The abuse was so brutal, I could not believe someone that said they loved me so profoundly would do those things to me.

Perhaps he’s found someone that’s willing to accept abuse, but that’s not what the law says.

Re: on Friday January 07, 2022 @11:19AM (#29840930)
It is but obviously that costs money
Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @04:44PM (#29830696)
On the point of Nat Friedman, I've reached out to [name redacted]is Ohanian who public holds himself out to be a vocal advocate of women's rights.

Nat and [name redacted]is are collaborators as VCs on such companies as Polywork, Deel, Reteam, and more.

Nat's wife Stephanie, who ignored my pleas for help with the abuse I suffered, and blocked me after reaching out and showing her several graphic texts messages in which [name redacted] told me I was worthless and should kill myself and is on the board of many of these companies.

[name redacted]is but refuses to discuss these allegations [name redacted] or my experiences in spite of several public comments asking for help which he has deleted.

Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @11:02AM (#29825254)
He’s not a private person. He had a podcast with Nat and presents at conferences.

[name redacted] told me being a “bad programmer” was a reason to kill myself.

Kind of strange from a guy that didn’t know the definitions of OOP or functional programming.

Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @10:56AM (#29825164)
Counting days is relevant to the amount of time the story too to change from “strangling” to recanting the police report.

It’s called documenting and understanding the facts.

I’m not interested in mental health advice from a DV apologist that can’t get the facts straight or count.

Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @09:34AM (#29823963)
Honestly, this feels like stuff [name redacted] would say, but I can’t say for sure.

[name redacted] had an intense focus on love and being loved when it came to control.

He asked me to marry him after only knowing him a month, which I declined. We hadn’t even slept together at that point.

According to his own account, the “love” he shoved down my throat so hard was so he could sleep with me, which I have several texts that show his own admissions.

Also I’m a bit taken aback at the ethnic slur in the username of this account.

Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @03:54AM (#29821004)
Heated 52 days after the incident?
Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @03:32AM (#29820888)
You're posting too.

It wasn't 3 years ago. It was 2 years ago.

I've already said everything I've needed to say on Twitter about the emotional abuse and how it lead to the physical abuse.

[name redacted] has made his own confessions in regards to how he manipulated my emotions to keep me under control.

Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @03:01AM (#29820677)
They want to remain anonymous, but their accounts will be used as evidence if necessary.
Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:58AM (#29820661)
That report is extremely detailed and graphically violent. That would be really strange if the police made up all those details.

You seemed to have upheld your story again on Twitter.

Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:53AM (#29820627)
Saving evidence... is crazy?
Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:50AM (#29820608)
Then why did you say "[name redacted] strangled me too" on my post about [name redacted] strangling me?
Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:49AM (#29820601)
[name redacted] sexually assaulted and emotionally abused me. You can't change that.

[name redacted] unblocked me and tried to convince me to have sex with him again. He's the one that reinitiated contact.

I thought staying in contact would ultimately result in the apology I deserve, but resulted in him trying to convince me to commit suicide.

Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:07AM (#29820345)
And your situation has no bearing on the violence and abuse that I and several other women have endured at his hands.
Re: on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:56AM (#29820284)
Let's also not forget that you accused him of strangling you on twitter as well.
Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @11:13PM (#29819290)
Well, that was really strange then. I don't know who would have defrauded the votes, because it certainly wasn't me.
Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @10:00PM (#29818710)
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/balabhadra-alex-graveley

This lists patents for MobileCoin naming [name redacted]

Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @09:32PM (#29818422)
You don't have to be an American to make an open records request.

Here's a patent for MobileCoin calling him [name redacted]. https://patents.justia.com/inventor/balabhadra-alex-graveley

Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @09:22PM (#29818332)
I'm aware of my rights.

In regards to the front-page, there's a lot of downvotes. Went from 160 upvotes to 121 in a matter of minutes. I suspect bots.

Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @09:11PM (#29818254)
Yes, look at what happened to Gabby Petito. Strangulation can get serious very quickly.
Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @09:06PM (#29818227)
Liz's boss, Charity Majors, has been friends with [name redacted] and Nat since she was 17 and [name redacted] was 15 through their "Hungry Programmers" organization.

Liz works with another friend of their staff engineers Chris Toshok, who interestingly enough was dating Charity when she was underage and he is 9 years her senior.

Charity and Chris are connected to a credit card hacker Max Visions, which is documented in the non-fiction book Kingpin by Kevin Poulsen https://www.kingpin.cc/about/

Charity told me to keep quiet about [name redacted] and Nat or bad things would happen to me and lied to me by saying she doesn't know [name redacted] when she clearly does.

Liz Fong-Jones uses the fact that she donated money to create the Solidarity Fund to decide who is a valid whistleblower or not.

Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @08:24PM (#29817872)
The lateness thing is very spot on. I have text messages of him accusing me on intentionally trying to hurt his feelings because I didn't want to sit around for hours waiting for him in a public place alone so he could finish at the gym because he "forgot" we were supposed to meet up.

This was the beginning of a long chain of emotionally abusive, controlling, and manipulative behaviors.

Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @08:14PM (#29817779)
The suit is a defamation suit in reference to me discussing publicly abuse I suffered. The judge mentioned the warrant is how I was able to confirm that the warrant existed.
Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @06:49PM (#29816990)
Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @06:48PM (#29816971)
Re: on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @06:40PM (#29816894)
I've spoken to several people that have described anything ranging from emotionally abusive rants, workplace sexual harassment, and sexual assault.

He assaulted me too.

Older »