_abattoir
wan: one
tu: two
meli: female, from Tok Pisin mewi, from "Mary" (as in, the Virgin)
lukin: looking
ale: all
en: and
ike: icky
jaki: yucky
insa: inside
jelo: yellow
kalama: clamor
kama: come
ken: can
kule: color
lape: sleepy
lawa: law
linja: line
lili: little
lupa: loop
mani: money
mu: moo
musi: amusing/music
nanpa: number
nimi: name
open: open
pilin: feeling
sama: same
selo: shell
sike: circle
suno: sun
mun: moon
toki: talking
wile: will
Was really hoping to get a source for that, as that is a very interesting proposition to leave uncited.
Ancient Upheavals Show How to Geoengineer a Stable Climate
One of my frustrations with synesthesia is describing the "impossible" colors when people ask about letters lie 0, O, I, or 1... In my mind these are simultaneously transparent, black, AND white.... but when you write out "zero", "oh" and "one" the colors are different!
And don't forget the "blurring" when you try to describe what color a _word_ is... Sometimes the first letter takes dominance, sometimes a middle syllable is particularly strong and has more color than the rest... where's the logic? ;P
That said, I wouldn't trade synesthesia for the world. I love having a free set of associations to help with recall and learning. The number of times I've remembered something because of its color rather than a more logical reason is too many to count.
I admire the boldness and as a Linguistics major I can confirm the craziness of the word, re: standing out, is way more valuable than any imagined revulsion that I may be assuming.
Best of luck.
The words are simple, but the choice to include the risky language is not 'simple', in that it's risky/innovative/uncomfortable/attention-grabbing (depending on viewer's perception). I guess a good word is 'unusual'.
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cthulhu_Mythos_deities#Bast
So for the example of an actuary, ideally their job would also be automated by an advanced program. Not an impossibly advanced one, mind you - it certainly would not have to be smarter than even the 50th percentile of programs out there today. If we took every actuary working 9 to 5, and instead threw all of their tens of thousands of daily working hours at coding a program to do their job, how soon do you think we could automate an entire industry?
This extends to all jobs, eventually. You are seeing it happen today, with farming. Tomorrow, we will see taxi and Lyft drivers replaced with self driving cars, and mail/package delivery given entirely to robots and drones.
The moral of the story is we should automate jobs that people don't like doing.
I don't appreciate the fact that you run so far away with this doomsday scenario of "no insurance means we all get sick and die". Try to focus on the discussion the article wants us to have, not on the side-scenario that you want to use to rationalize actuaries or other poorly optimized vocations.
Over about 20,000 years of the water cycle, yeah.
Ideally we'd want a water solution that didn't involve carting incalculable amounts of rainwater across the countryside...
His advice does, however, benefit every venture capitalist.
Seriously. Harmlessly manipulating cockroaches in a science experiment equates to "trading our humanity"? Give me a break. You are complicit in 100x as much "unethical" treatment of animals on a daily basis. The vast majority of products you buy, eat, use, and rely on have probably been tested on animals much more complex than cockroaches. If this study bothers you as much as you say it does, I challenge you to go without any and all consumer products made with at least as much unethical research. Of course, you'll have to do some research yourself to even find out which products and services you need to abandon. Good luck.
The military argument isn't half bad, so I'm sorry to see it go to waste in the alarmist wasteland of your rhetoric, but if this study's been published, then you almost know for certain the men upstairs have had tech like this for decades. Any panic you stir now would be wasted.
Au revoir, Sir Pratchett, you magnificent human.
I agree with the reasoning, but am curious how iterative creativity can be applied on the individual scale for projects that take longer than a month and a half to complete.