__i___ii____
Smelly snails and deep purple: This ancient dye costs $2,700 per gram
How America Ends
Okay... let's see:
>increased wealth distribution (globally)
Trend began before the internet (the subject at hand).
>changing social norms towards individual rights and equality
Trend began before the internet (the subject at hand).
>I can, for example, participate in international engineering efforts from any one of a billion places with steady internet that will allow me to stay.
Irrelevant to the subject at hand.
>I can eat a greater variety of foods than my grandparents enjoyed. I can do research and study about my own medical alignments and make better informed decisions about my healthcare than every before. I have the option to marry anyone that agrees to it, regardless of race or gender. I can practice the religion of my choosing openly.
All irrelevant to the subject at hand.
>I understand that there is a lot of pain and a large risk of group think associated with our global information system. I have the individual freedom to choose which information sources I tune into, and I have never had a greater variety than today.
Disagree. It isn't about your basic individual freedom to choose. You can choose, yes. But it is about the field of vision presented to the focus of your mind, or rather the collective mind. It is about the narrowing of that field of view. Narrow the field of view: narrow the choices people believe they have. This, in effect, narrows their choices, regardless of their ability, or freedom, to choose.
The Ideology of Censorship
To David Chang, the ‘ethnic’ food aisle is racist. Others say it’s convenient
List of American Utopian Communities
One of the world's biggest porn sites is branching into fine art
Jeffrey Epstein Tapes Emerge: Describes His Lifestyle in Unearthed Recordings
Facebook Connected Her to a Tattooed Soldier in Iraq. Or So She Thought
Lee Atwater (1981): Interview with Alexander P. Lamis: Rough Transcript
Molyneux's response to the article.