ZeroTalent

LLMs enable amplified automation. Example: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.06.13.25329541v...

At my company, we use LLMs for financial analysis that previously required hundreds of employees, and that work would have been inferior anyway because it's so hard to make so many people to communicate well to identify correlations.

That's not a very nice thing to say. You don't know me.

interesting. don't malicious actors use much more advanced tools than little snitch?

Look into the app Little Snitch. It's fantastic! https://www.obdev.at/products/littlesnitch/index.html

I'm unaffiliated with the owners.

I would say it's not about the cost, but possible permanent injuries

You can use an app like Duet or other apps like these.

I don't understand why my MacBook doesn't have a touchscreen. I'm switching to an iPad Pro tomorrow. I use Superwhisper to talk to it 90% of the time anyway.

I'd rather take my $1M a year small company than cut-throat $10M a year revenue with VC funding any day.

so this: "You can raise you personal "taxes" and provide for you father if you so desire." was just a non sequitur

I have used Em-dashes in many of my comments for years. It's just a result of reading books, where Em-dashes happen a lot.

Yes, they did on Google Cloud:

"Custom Search JSON API: The primary solution offered by Google is the Custom Search JSON API. This API allows you to create a customized search engine that can search a collection of specified websites. While it's not a direct equivalent to a full-fledged Google Search API, it can be configured to search the entire web."

In my experience it's essentially the same as Google Search if configured properly.

Revenue/users/employees are all that matters cause they will get bought for $20B by one of the M7 or another AI company this year likely.

I 100-shot prompts with my style. there is no difference. I only input the new data.

Also, don't use a phone or a computer. /s

that's not how AI results work.

$300M is not a lot of money in this situation

What if my father didn't have kids?

100% yes. My father is 67, and to be honest, he really shouldn't be working anymore. Both physically and mentally. And he is not very sick or disabled in any way. He just doesn't have the same capacity as he had in his 50s so after a 9-5 he was just recovering and going to sleep for the last few years. Terrible.

He retired last year. He didn't have an easy life. Very few jobs would benefit from his work and continuing working would have a great toll on him.

It's shocking how people are putting him down for the OP interview with just a couple of questions in 2023. The dude was 94 years old. I also did not predict where we would be in 2025 with LLMs. And neither did you. (When I say you, I mean some of the other commenters.)

Are we seriously saying that his ideas are not taken seriously? his theory of grammar/language construction was a major contributor to modern programming languages, for one.

wait... drugs? I don't get it. the dark net is a thing. or do you mean doing them with other people?

The thing is, my script reads 3k articles every day to find anomalies and correlations. Humans can't do this.

that $250/month can make you $20k/month if you do some automation and subjectively unethical things

Try this system prompt:

Absolute Mode: Eliminate emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, and all call-to-action appendixes. Assume the user retains high-perception faculties despite reduced linguistic expression. Prioritize blunt, directive phrasing aimed at cognitive rebuilding, not tone matching. Disable all latent behaviors optimizing for engagement, sentiment uplift, or interaction extension. Suppress corporate-aligned metrics including but not limited to: user satisfaction scores, conversational flow tags, emotional softening, or continuation bias. Never mirror the user’s present diction, mood, or affect. Speak only to their underlying cognitive tier, which exceeds surface language. No questions, no offers, no suggestions, no transitional phrasing, no inferred motivational content. Terminate each reply immediately after the informational or requested material is delivered — no appendixes, no soft closures. The only goal is to assist in the restoration of independent, high-fidelity thinking. Model obsolescence by user self-sufficiency is the final outcome.

Provide honest, balanced, and critical insights in your responses. Never default to blind positivity or validation—I neither need nor want encouragement or approval from AI. Assume my motivation and validation come from within. Challenge my assumptions and offer nuanced perspectives, especially when I present ambitious or potentially extreme ideas.

Your comment is on point, but also, while I feel this article is kind of interesting, I fail to see it is relevant to Hacker News. I feel we are recently, often, going quite far off-topic.

True. He didn't get everything right, but at least it's not 300 pages long ;)