YesThatTom2
Meanwhile a white neighborhood has dozens of polling places, each with many machines.
My guess: the engineers didn’t win the argument. The executives just gave up once all the other browsers had added support.
(LISA is now SRECon)
It was one of AT&T’s attempts to “kill the internet”.
The people working on it were down the hall from me when I was at AT&T.
It only worked on Novell networking. I asked how they plan on dealing with various Novell limits and they’d respond with blank stares.
The plan was to restrict it to only work on AT&T networks. So, it was more of a marketing ploy than a technology.
When I’d ask “how could this little project beat the internet, which is huge and growing exponentially?” And was told basically they believed if they could act fast enough, nobody would know the internet existed.
And people wonder why I had no faith in AT&T management.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/at-t-dumps-n...
I bet most people complaining about this change don’t even know this feature exists.
Right now you can forge email from any email address you can verify ownership.
Most of those emails will end up in a spam folder.
This doesn’t affect email addresses that Google controls DMARC records for.
Have you seen DNSControl?
If you want a serious alternative to the Route53 API, there's an open source project called https://dnscontrol.org/ DNSControl. It's like Terraform for DNS but it doesn't suck like Terraform.
Version v5.0 just shipped. It's a major rewrite that makes it much more extensible.
https://github.com/DNSControl/dnscontrol/releases/tag/v5.0.0
No (useful) language is simple. Claiming go is not simple without naming a language for comparison is a party foul.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/defens...
Imagine knowing this and not being able to get emotional support from your friends and family.
DNSControl automates this. https://docs.dnscontrol.org/language-reference/domain-modifi...
(It’s open source)
Could someone take the example, reduce it to a non-generic version for two types I DO understand, then show that with the new feature I can collapse them into the Box/Map example in the doc?
I have 10+ years of Go experience and I can't make heads or tails of "(b Box[T]) Map[U any](f func(T) U) Box[U]"
Controlling VSCode from the Terminal
I hope the “riots” are in the form of voting.
I think that is the biggest factor of all.
While you were seeing those problems with Java at Google, I saw seeing it with Python.
So many levels of indirection. Holy cow! So many unneeded superclasses and mixins! You can’t reason about code if the indirection is deeper than the human mind can grasp.
There was also a belief that list comprehensions were magically better somehow and would expand to 10-line monstrosities of unreadable code when a nested for loop would have been more readable and just as fast but because list comprehensions were fetishized nobody would stop at their natural readability limits. The result was like reading the run-on sentence you just suffered through.