News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Tinos

Re:What if your AI could buy you a car? on Wednesday May 13, 2026 @10:02AM (#48122029)
I just bought my first car and man I wish this was an option instead of just copy pasting hundreds of links to my notes app
Would love to see the applications of this in anti-cheat
Re:Neubrutalism: A Guide to the Design Movement on Friday March 13, 2026 @08:24AM (#47363498)
Built with vanilla HTML, CSS & JS. No frameworks

That's something I haven't seen in a while!

Neat! Do you have a simple TLDR for how it was done? I'm assuming HTML canvas but would be curious to hear the mathematics behind it

Show HN: Lucent Chat – Create videos and images with Veo, Sora, etc. in one chat

https://lucentchat.com

Hey HN,We built Lucent Chat because creating with AI has become a mess. You'd ask ChatGPT for a prompt, copy it into another tool, tweak settings, open three tabs, run into token limits, and lose your style halfway through. Iteration was slow, context vanished, and the process killed the creative flow.Lucent Chat is our attempt to fix that - a single chat where you can generate, refine, and...

( Read More... | 1 comment | 9 points | on HN )
At my old company we did some guerilla marketing on Reddit and got a post go mega viral (front page for 3 days) 15k+ upvotes.

For us it was a bit different because we were doing robotic F&B so people could come to our restaurant to see the place from Reddit IRL.

I would target memes in niche dev communities if you want direct outreach. Like if you're looking for people to test your product you'd have more luck on a 100 upvote post in some obscure deeptech subreddit then you would if your post got 10k upvotes on r/funny.

Sorry for any grammar mistakes - writing this on the rush hour train :)

Re:Googler... ex-Googler on Sunday April 13, 2025 @06:04AM (#43671599)
"I really was just a fuckin cog in a mega corp"

Yup. Must have been a horrific wake up call :(

Re:The best programmers I know on Thursday April 10, 2025 @09:42AM (#43643681)
Fantastic post - you've made me feel a lot better about admitting that I didn't know something during my interview yesterday!

Really well written and insightful.

I believe most of the popular image viewers you'll see discussed in this thread will be using very low-level renderers.

I'm in discussions with friends of Electro on what approach would be best to take. I go into more detail on this announcement made on the discussions board: https://github.com/pTinosq/Electro/discussions/17

Just a reminder that this is *free* open source software. I understand your concerns, and I agree with some of them. This is my first proper open source project so there are bound to be some issues ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I will take your advice into account for future updates. Thank you

So this is a hotly debated subject and I 100% understand why and even agree with many people on this. I do firmly believe that Electro is indeed "hyperfast" even with WebView2 and that's down to the fact that there is absolutely zero bloat shipped with the tool & every addition is carefully considered for its potential performance impact before it's added.

I had a meeting today with 6 other software engineers who are interested in the project & have experience in computer graphics (a topic I will admit is not my strongest) and we all unanimously agreed to gradually shift Electro away from WebView2 and towards a custom-built 2D renderer for truly native "hyperfast" performance :)

As mentioned in another reply on this thread, I'm not here to fool anyone - this is version ~4.0 of Electro and the first version I feel is feature rich enough to ship publicly. The other 3 versions of experimentation (over the last year and a half) included Rust, C++ & OpenGL, Electron, and Tauri all of which had significant pitfalls.

The final decision was to "just ship it" and see how the community reacts. I've seen (as I anticipated) a huge number of people suggesting we move away from Tauri and that's exactly what we will do.

Open sourcing this project was keeping me up at night because deep inside I knew that it would need another version. That being said, I'm so glad I did it or else there would not be any pressure to actually do it and it probably would have ended up just like all my other dozens of projects that are just sat in private repos collecting dust. At least now with this version people can A) Enjoy using a new tool w/ unique features (built-in terminal, performance focus) and B) Even contribute if they feel like doing so.

I'm very excited to see where this goes but the compass is very clearly pointing towards ultra low-level rendering techniques and I honestly can't wait to set sail!!

So I spoke to one of the contributors of Tauri who got back to me with the following response: " It's not a thing tauri controls and the telemetry settings are an operating system setting since you are running windows this kind of telemetry is not completely avoidable."

He also kindly pointed to this GH Issue which discusses your privacy concern: https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/WebView2Feedback/issues/105...

This quote from the issue stood out in particular: " WebView2 is considered a Windows component, and the data collection consent is governed by Windows Diagnostic setting on Windows 10 as a centralized switch.

End users are empowered to control the data collection of WebView2 and can do so via toggling the Windows Diagnostic setting on Windows 10. This is also what the Edge browser does. On Windows 7/8.1, because there is no Windows Diagnostic setting, we treat this as no consent for optional data. There is very limited required data that the OS always collects, unless you're on some specific SKUs. Developers are definitely welcomed to convey that to their end users and ask them to use the OS toggle. "

I've been meaning to move away from Tauri + WebView2, this might be the best call to make (not only for this reason of course)

I haven't been able to do direct comparisons but they most likely have very similar performance. The major bottleneck with Electro at the moment (which will certainly be addressed on Electro (internal) v5.0 aka Electro Next) is the reliance on Tauri & WebView2.

As soon as I can port over core functionality to a custom desktop renderer things will go from being 10x faster (currently) to 1000x faster (the end goal).

I'm currently trying to balance Electro with: university final year, job applications, 2 other OSS projects I contribute to, and a friends' business website so these features will most likely take many months to get through. I'm hoping the eyes Electro has gained from this announcement will bring in some talent who know more about lower level image viewer functionality than I do so that they can help guide the project towards the ultimate performance-first tech stack!

Naturally images of this magnitude will take slightly longer to load on any hardware & image viewer. It's not instant but it's also significantly faster than the other image viewers I have tried on my system.

I downloaded NASA's photos of the moon and tested those with wonderful results. I was actually using these enormous 16k+ images during my testing specifically because they are the ultimate benchmark for image viewer performance!

Not yet but 100% a feature we can get shipped (seems to be pretty high demand)
Oh bloody hell of course Microsoft is pulling off stunts like this. Thanks for raising this, I'll have a look at what my options are to turn this off.

Tauri 2.0 was initially chosen because it would let me get an MVP out quickly to start getting user feedback (like your own). My end goal is to move to a custom renderer so I'm not relying on Chromium / WebView2. This will take many months of work I suspect (balancing with my FYP @ university & other projects).

Would absolutely love to get linux & macOS included. I don't own a mac so naturally that will need to be community contributed / wait until I cough up the money. Linux is 100% on the agenda.

Thanks for bringing Oculante to my attention - it looks awesome! That level of functionality is what I'm striving for (w/o as much UI clutter though).

I feel the TS & CSS pain. Electro v1.0 was C# WPF and very very very fast but the UI was just rubbish and I knew C# WPF would hold me back in the future. Electro v2.0 was then written in C++ but I didn't get far with it because I REALLY didn't like writing C++. Electro v3.0 was then written with Electron + TS + CSS but electron is shit. Finally, I landed where we are today - it struck the perfect balance of performant, modern language, fun to write, allowing for rapid iteration.

Will Electro stay with the TS+CSS+Tauri stack forever? Probably not! As the community grows I hope bring in contributors who are more well versed in the world of low-level image viewers to help guide Electro to be EVEN FASTER & closer to the system level (Like Electro v2.0 aimed to be w/ c++).

For the time being I've decided to just ship with what I have and iterations will come later. I do dream of the day we go frameworkless (to an extent ofc) and render everything from the GPU at nanosecond speeds while also maintaining the sleek feeling Electro currently has!

Loved Irfanview, switched to ImageGlass for aesthetics (hated the performance), switched back to Irfanview, hated how ancient it felt.

Electro aims to do what an image viewer should do best - show images. There aren't any UI elements when an image is first loaded - hence the hidden terminal (pack a lot of functionality without worrying about visual clutter).

I have been carefully thinking about the direction I want to take with UI elements. The goal was to build the fastest & most efficient image viewer. Will I achieve this through clickable UI elements? Through keybinds only? Through terminal? Only time and testing will tell.

The project is fresh out of the oven and ready to be moulded into whatever the community wants it to be. The two mantras Electro will always stand by are Performance & Efficiency.

Thanks for the thread - loved reading everyone's thoughts.

P.S JPEGView was by far my favourite but again, too ancient. I want something truly fresh and that was the goal of this project

Being able to launch Electro via CLI would be awesome! Never really done something like that - might have a look at implementing it (unless you want to contribute :^)

The project is in its infancy at the moment. Features like keyboard controls to zoom etc. are all on the table - I love when users give me all these ideas for where to take the project

Hey! Appreciate the concern w/ web requests. If you look closely at the URL you'll notice that all the requests are to *.localhost addresses. This is just how Tauri's asset handling & IPC systems work - nothing to worry about :)

I've gone ahead and create a GitHub Issue about setting up a checkbox with the installer such that it doesn't force Electro as the default app. It's something I wanted to add pre-announcement but figured it wouldn't be as much of a requested feature as it clearly is, my bad.

Thanks for the feedback!

Thanks for the constructive feedback - the folder feature is 100% coming soon, it was one of my favourite features from other viewers as well.

I'll create an issue for the resizing, good spot!

Feedback is always greatly appreciated :))

Show HN: Electro – A hyper-fast Windows image viewer with a built-in terminal

https://github.com/pTinosq/Electro

This is my first major OSS release! I was always so frustrated by how slow image viewers were on Windows so I built one from the ground up with Rust & Tauri v2.0!Electro also has a very unique feature: a built-in terminal. I was always mesmerised by merging CLI tools with GUI based systems and this is my first go at it!I have big plans on expanding the terminal functionality with built-in...

( Read More... | 40 comments | 8 points | on HN )
The project was originally built just for personal use as I was just so frustrated by how boring Windows image viewers are.

I think part of my anxiety comes from the fact that I’m also working on shaping my online presence to improve employability and my GitHub profile is something employers often look at.

I wish this was just about sharing what I love, but it has also become a strategic move which makes a positive launch feel more high-stakes than it probably should.

Open sourcing my project feels terrifying. Is this anxiety normal?

I'm currently working on an performance focused image viewer w/ a built-in terminal for Windows and it is open source but I have not announced it anywhere so nobody know about it just yet.I think it is in a state to start gaining some user feedback & general traction but I have this deep fear that has been planted in my head by SWE Twitter elitism and a strange fear of letting strangers...

( Read More... | 4 comments | on HN )
Re:Biases in Apple's Image Playground on Monday February 17, 2025 @10:14AM (#43079772)
I wonder if adding a simple "Describe yourself" feature along with the image to help guide the model would fix this?

Like if the model was told he is a white male + given the image

Re:Whisky War [Canada / Denmark Border] on Monday February 17, 2025 @10:08AM (#43079716)
The timeline is such a great laugh!

Advice for those getting into OSS contributing

I've been writing code for almost a decade now but had never really delved into contributing to OSS. I have found myself approaching the end of university with quite a lot of time on my hands and would love to try and help out.I recently stumbled across the Ladybird browser project which is exactly the sort of project I would be interested in contributing to, however, whenever I go onto a...

( Read More... | 3 comments | 4 points | on HN )

Older »