News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

TehShrike

Re:Take my toil, leave me my struggle on Friday October 23, 2026 @09:54AM (#50209040)
Presumably folks who want to subscribe to this blog would already receive a notification in their email.
Re:Take my toil, leave me my struggle on Friday October 23, 2026 @12:39AM (#50204585)
What is the point of submitting a page like this with no content if there isn't an archive.is or some other archive page that can be linked to
Here are some examples from a Normal Person: https://www.eleanorkonik.com/p/muse-was-my-gateway-drug-to-g...
A fellow Jane Jacobs enjoyer?
Even if you take the problem seriously as he describes it, it is delusional to imagine that a formal degree would be the solution.

Not that I would consider a "licensure required to use a sharp knife" kind of world, even if it would solve some problems.

Not that I disagree with the folks terrified of so much code being generated within Loops, but as far as it goes, this is a good reminder that if you're getting a LLM to do something, you should probably give it access to your feedback mechanisms.
Re:The Coming Loop on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @11:57AM (#48661835)
Yes, a lot of software shops have produced equivalent slop, but I've worked on teams that aimed higher, and they were much more productive over the long haul – not just in fewer bugs, but also in straight up ability to add more features as the software got complicated.
Re:What Is a Dickover? on Friday May 29, 2026 @11:17PM (#48332166)
I suspect many developers know the truth, at least to some degree. Their boss said "it's only one [more] popup, add it anyway."

Repeat ad infinitum

Re:Mythical Man Month on Saturday May 09, 2026 @09:28AM (#48074814)
There have been plenty of libraries/tools that got people from "I would like to do foo" to "oh, this tool makes foo possible in under 10 hours, I should start working on foo" in the past. LLMs have done this for many foos, which is great.

But I'm with hansvm - I haven't actually seen anyone plausibly maintain 10x. 10x is different from getting people past their activation cost.

There are two types of CS fundamentals: the ones that help in making useful software, and the rest of them.

AI tools still don't care about the former most of the time (e.g. maybe we shouldn't do a loop inside of loop every time we need to find a matching record, maybe we should just build a hashmap once).

And I don't care if they care about the latter.

I agree to a certain point, but I think about it in different terms – some people want to avoid any form of disagreement in order to maintain a kind of politeness, but I want to work on a team where people care enough to disagree with each other if something is wrong: https://joshduff.com/2024-07-18-communication-culture.html
I found the source code Jade was referring to, and it looks like the author just noticed this thread: https://github.com/nkuntz1934/matrix-workers/commit/0823b47c...
Re:Fighting Fire with Fire: Scalable Oral Exams on Friday January 02, 2026 @06:09PM (#46470640)
My ability to recall and express things that I have learned is different when writing versus speaking. I suspect this is true for others as well.

I would prefer to write responses to textual questions rather than respond verbally to spoken questions in most cases.

Re:A super fast website using Cloudflare workers on Thursday January 01, 2026 @02:46PM (#46457340)
Correct, all the filtering is done locally in the browser, and the deploy is purely static.

If PSA had let me use affiliate links, I was planning to do the work to SSR in a Cloudflare Worker, but they declined and I decided to call the project where it was.

Re:A super fast website using Cloudflare workers on Wednesday December 31, 2025 @12:12PM (#46446020)
I made a fast usable product page recently https://www.buyadagger.com/
hey, haven't seen that one in the wild for a little bit :-D https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/aaaah
If the college would accept someone like that, they probably don't aim to take their students to a very high level.
Re:Cloudflare outage on November 18, 2025 post mortem on Tuesday November 18, 2025 @09:21PM (#45975134)
I'm feeling generous tonight, I'm willing to consider 0.99986 to round to 99.99%
I worked on a business app made with lit web components and all properties being stringly typed was a real drag. It didn't compare to a realtime-first component library.
Re:The Mac App Flea Market on Monday September 15, 2025 @10:23AM (#45250109)
One of the reasons I value SetApp so much for Mac apps is that it's curated and I don't have to worry about filtering a bunch of shady or low-quality apps.
Re:Myths About Floating-Point Numbers (2021) on Wednesday August 13, 2025 @11:18AM (#44889612)
You can divide by zero, but you mayn't.
Re:How I Use Kagi on Thursday July 17, 2025 @04:35PM (#44597902)
I had the same reaction – his list includes washingtonpost.com, amazon.com, alternativeto.net, medium.com, twitter.com, msn.com, etc.

He dumped his entire blocklist, which must include a bunch of sites that he finds personally annoying.

Here is the list of domains owned by the 16 companies discussed in the post that he linked to: https://codeberg.org/bbbhltz/16CompaniesFilters/src/branch/m...

Re:Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @04:34PM (#43920296)
Here is a similar article primarily about middle-aged adults: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spi...
I was excited for that proposal, but it veered off course some years ago – some TC39 members have stuck to the position that without member property support or async/await support, they will not let the feature move forward.

It seems like most people are just asking for the simple function piping everyone expects from the |> syntax, but that doesn't look likely to happen.

Re:There Are Two Types of Dishwasher People on Thursday April 17, 2025 @03:00PM (#43720816)
My mental model for diswashers got a lot better after watching some Technology Connections: https://youtu.be/jHP942Livy0
Any plans to add an option to render the tablature for bass guitar?
Re:Against Best Practices on Monday November 18, 2024 @07:46PM (#42178998)
I agree with you, I think you're describing the same sort of person I was thinking of in the second paragraph of this post: https://joshduff.com/2022-02-07-eschatology-of-software.html
Re:Against Best Practices on Monday November 18, 2024 @11:10AM (#42173747)
> I don't think anyone has ever thought that best practices will always benefit you.

Whenever a "best practice" or "convention" has been presented to me, that is how it has been framed. (...it is best practice, therefore, it will definitely benefit you to follow it)

Older »