T_T
Re:CotEditor – Text Editor for OS X
on Thursday November 20, 2014 @06:04PM (#8638777)
why are we making another editor.
i don't feel like this is significantly different from whatsapp. at least not yet
Re:This link will disappear after 365 views
on Saturday August 03, 2013 @07:06PM (#6153766)
snapchat for links.
Re:Ask HN: What laptop to buy?
on Saturday August 03, 2013 @06:46PM (#6153723)
macbook air 11 inch.
Re:Google Pressure Cookers and Backpacks, Get a Visit from the Feds
on Thursday August 01, 2013 @01:42PM (#6142021)
Minority Report, everybody.
Re:Stop Glorifying Hard Work and Long Hours
on Wednesday July 10, 2013 @11:35AM (#6020422)
"I have a friend who brags that he busts his * 60 hours a week driving a Coca-Cola delivery truck. Congratulations, I work 35 and make twice as much as he does."
Is success or contribution measured by your salary? This is only fair if we can all stop drinking beverages delivered to our offices.
Re:IE11 to support WebGL
on Tuesday June 25, 2013 @07:42PM (#5943193)
better late than never i guess.
Github issues redesign
Re:Gmail Blue
on Monday April 01, 2013 @12:40AM (#5471477)
not so impressed by this april fools. =(
Re:Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
on Wednesday March 20, 2013 @11:37PM (#5412722)
Question I would ask: How would you feel if Google acquired Feedly tomorrow?
Reason I ask: Google scrapped Notebook (http://www.google.com/googlenotebook/faq.html) a while back, and has now released Google Keep. To me, this is a tear down and rebranding. I can't speak to the reason of it, but I would guess Google Keep already has more users than Notebook did. I can't speak for Google, but I certainly know their goal is not to lose 500k users to Feedly. My guess being, they likely want to take the smoothest, but also cheapest, way out of a product that they can no longer maintain.
Re:Google Keep, a New Service for Taking Notes
on Tuesday March 19, 2013 @06:49PM (#5404147)
While I think this is an interesting point, at the same time, it looks like it may have been more difficult technically and brand-wise for google to migrate notebook to drive (which I think is the goal). It probably made more sense for them to discontinue notebook, which had a relatively small userbase, and relaunch it as a new product/brand under the drive suite.
Re:You don't need a UX specialist
on Monday March 11, 2013 @01:12PM (#5358103)
Lets (for a moment) agree that we can achieve 99% of UX via common sense.
The question I would ask is: Would you make the same argument for Typography? (I know, seems completely unrelated)
Typography, we can say, is just making text readable, organized, and appealing. We can all read some info about kerning, leading, and spacing, and their common ratios. Then, pick up a 'modern' typeface and that would then bring us to 99% of making a new webapp/site beautiful in terms of type?
Re:You don't need a UX specialist
on Monday March 11, 2013 @01:04PM (#5358045)
Agreed. Original article is a dismissal of the amount of research and consideration that goes into UX.
Re:90°, an iBook by Andrew Kim
on Saturday March 09, 2013 @02:44PM (#5349371)
=( too bad this is iBook exclusive. Andrew Kim's work is always top notch.