T3OU-736
My own helacipusly amateur take is that given the speed of and, intentional or otherwise, access to various things that the models are granted, it does seem super-useful to maintain the inspectability of chain of reasoning which lead to actions taken (and other artifacts) by the model.
If things become inscrutable, they are on the path of being ineffable.
https://keepass.info/help/kb/yubikey.html talks of different ways of doing something like that, but I've not played with it yet.
Another option is just to store passkeys natively on the token itself?
I... Am not sure how I feel about it. On tech merits, this absolutely makes sense - the tech is slinging private keys around, and their secure storage is a hard problem.
On the practical merits - maybe? Token-backed decryption of the password manager's database seems like a devent solution? But does this happen? Is there a password manager which uses the public key derived from FIDO2 token's on-chip private key to decrypt the database?
On-token storage is limited (though 100 passkeys on a YK 5 Nano is fairly generous) - but what if we just used the YK as the "Private key is here and ONLY here" setup?
I kinda like the OFFOAD+ design - it promises to show me to where I am authenticating. With origin binding should be a nobrainer, but still, it speaks to me.
The PCP is absolutely nowhere _near_ the graphical wizardry of the state of this app, and the overlay of executing code atop a given directory structure is quite beautiful (practicality be damned), but I can see the inspiration.
I do wonder if, on a modern Linux system with SELinix, this model (code accessing a directory) is actually closer to viable? SELinux's contexts/labels for subjects overlaying with the same for objects can, I imagine, be visualized. The normal access patterns would be way too overwhelming, I think - but exceptions/policy violations? :ponder:
The IRIX OS even had functionality to migrate kobs and theor working memory closer to each other to lower the latency of access.
We see echoes of this when companies like high-frequency traders pay attention to motherboard layouts and co-locate and pin the PTS (proprietary trading systems) processes to specific cores based on which DIMMs are on which side of the memory controller.
IACR 2025 election cannot be verified due to lost decryption key
That does not appear to be true. The investagiom reporting shows that the shooter bought the guns after he turned 18 - the legal age to purchase them (long guns, aka rifles - different from pistols) in the state of Texas.
Buying things on credit seems like a reasonable way to do business in general - are you suggesting that all deadly weapons should be sold for cash to increase the difficulty of legally acquiring them and so lowering the frequency of mass shootings?
This is why NSA asked for (and got from SGI) a guranteed rate I/O API - to make sure that whstever the signal intelkigence platform sensors captured could be written to storage.
Not sure if there is any additional value in the re-coverage, though it does feel like the message is important enough to be spread, and I suspect there is more readers of The Verge than the original source.
(Not my core field, so this is SWAG-ish): There is also a separate but equally important problem of signal vs noise - isolating the signal for decryption. Doable, but fairly costly to implement, and far more brittle than I suspect would be acceptable.
Mine was that the noise generation was part of the adversary's actions (as is the presence of the drones themselves).
Are you suggesting that the noise (+encrypted data) is part of the airport's standard procedures, and authorized users pick out (and decrypt) the data, and everything else (like Command & Control) of adversarial devices is overwhelmed by the overall noise?
Against the drones, that would be difficult to prevent, but the limitations imposed by the transmitter gear (size, weight, inverse square law of area being jammed) would probably limit the impact.
The dedicated platform would be located via signal strength analysis and likely physically destroyed.
Wonder if the goal is as wholesome (tool for rescue) as it seems, or there is some sort of commodization of this sort of tools being done, and so should not be subject to any special restrictions or regulation.
It feels utterly wrong that there is not an Event Log entry (I am not an iCloud user, so cannot easily check) or some other, better log in place.
The snide cynic in me wants to reach for the whole "Apple does not expose this sort of detailed data to the user", but for backups, that seems important enough for that to not be the case?
Hit the front page (Android, Firefox Focus) Have a feed. Tried to follow https://atac.seraum.com/event/did-16-billion-login-credentia...
Got:
``` 404 - Not Found
The event you are looking for (did-16-billion-login-credentials-leaked) does not exist.
Return to the Live Feed
```
Hitting back gave a header, but instead of the feed items, I see `Could not load the feed. Please try again later.`
(Admittedly, it has been a while since I have done it) It did feel odd that there was not a mention of time discipline for the client/server and the impact on finer-grained stats. Perhaps, at least, mention that NTP (or, ideally, PTP, but that is a fair bit more involved) is strongly recommended to be running and stable (NTP's own jitter being low)?
Were SSNs in a GH repo?
Credentials for GH access grabted access to the database with SSNs in it?
Those both seem, in their own right, quite bad.
On SGI, the CrayLink HW had perfomance counters visible via the Performance CoPilot (nee PCP).
On Linux, NUMA arch has similar things (numastat, Intel's PCM, other tools). Depending on the workload, it may matter, but if the OS/tooling does not expose the counters, it isn't even possible to quantify the impact.
SGI's IRIX, due to the sheer physical size of their larger ccNUMA systems (AFAIK, AMD's NUMA is from SGI's ccNUMA), had the option to auto-migrate the workloads when certain CPU to working memory latency thresholds were reached.
I am very much hoping the effort succeeds, but I am also mindful of the fact that the site to which I have linked is more successful by virtue of having better coverage.
I am, however, quite pessimistic, that this NAS stays ub-enshittificated. (Un-shittified?).
A neat possibility would be to (notwithstandkng the privacy implications) is to use the NAS-level checksumming of files, something like SHA-256 or even MD5, and cross-check with known kaka files to detect backups of infected things.
Buuut, sunce this reminds me of the whole apple CSAM fiasco, so not likely.