Sulfolobus
Even if you remove build versioning and all transitive dependencies from your env (making it less reproducible...) they will break pretty damn quick.
[1] http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Poor-Had-No-Lawyers/dp/178027114...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Parliament_general_el...
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:U3-ruJk...
This means that UK Chagos Support Association does not have to follow charity law (i.e. be open about their work among other things), have a purpose considered as "charitable" [2], be run my trustees that don't personally benefit and/or be run independently. However, they could still be doing these things but be unable to register as a charity due wanting to do things that are prohibited as a charity e.g. "benefiting interests of a narrow closed group" or "campaigning for a change of government" among others [3]
(Of course it is open to debate whether many actual charities properly fulfil the stated requirements)
[1] http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfC...
[2] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/what-makes-a-char...
[3] https://www.gov.uk/how-to-set-up-a-charity-cc21a#step-1-deci...
People may be specifically interested in the first and second talks with the corollary of both being likely biased towards the MinIon:
- 1st is by Clive Brown (ONP CTO) and discusses the MinIon platform, background to the Nanopore technology, analysis platforms and the future PromethIon expansions - https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Ut...
- 2nd has Nick Loman (one of the MAP researchers but admitted 'fanboy') discussing the performance on the MinIon in his lab in 'real world' conditions - https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Ut...
Feel like I could write a book on the bullshit that occurred and that was just one fairly minor project. Suffice to say, lots of disingenuous 'helping' that was really just working out where exactly in the back to place the knife.
Several years later Alpi et al [3] took (a 36 author) swipe at the original Trevawas paper linked above and the discussion/field (e.g. [4]) it provoked. Essentially "no you are wrong and we all agree". Then, never one to be deterred by anyone else, Trevawas replied with this letter [5] as did Brenner [6].
All in all it was quite an amusing little academic slapfight.
There was quite a nice New Yorker article talking the general idea of the "plant intelligence" thing if anyone is interested [7].
[1] - http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/content/93/4/345
[2] - http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/content/93/4/353.long
[3] - http://web1.sssup.it/pubblicazioni/ugov_files/302981_2007_23...
[4] - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360138506...
[5] - http://www.linv.org/images/about_pdf/Trends%202007%20Trewava...
[6] - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360138507...
[7] - http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/23/the-intelligent...
You did remind me of this amusing paper from a few years ago though: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/5/80
Edit: I should note that the above is actually a genuine question.
http://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2012/08/06/how-doctors-die...
Expensive top flight barristers* with lots of experience (10-15 years minimum) that are recommended and appointed QC by the Lord Chancellor. They take precedence over other barristers and tend to be very expensive, experienced and with a proven case history and reputation. You can tell them because they get to wear silk gowns (sometimes being elected is known as "taking the silk")
Kinda the barrister equivalent of being elected to the National Academy of Sciences or a Fellow of the Royal Society.
* Barristers are one of two types of lawyers in the UK (the other being solicitors) they do most of the court-room advocacy etc.