RonaldDump

What's that got to do with anything?

What's stopping me from identifying variation in the frequency of different traits between ethnic groups in the current day? It's not a virtue to pretend not to notice such things (or, indeed, to be truly incapable of the most basic pattern recognition).

I think the argument could then be made that if you identify traits common to closely related tribes (eg. indigenous East African) that are noticeably different from the frequency or magnitude of these traits in a different cluster of closely related tribes (eg. indigenous Scandinavian) then there should be no reason to pretend to ignore them.

But if I understand the angle of "social constructioners" correctly, they're not disputing that what we might call 'ethnicities' or 'tribes' exist (ie. a group of people of common ancestry and with a distinct genotype), it's just that trying to lump the thousands of these into a few broad categories, like "black", is far too crude to be useful.

But ethnicities still exist. So would it not be valid to be "ethnicist" (ie. very specifically racist), like "Those Sami people are so x" or "Gosh those Bantu people are y"?

Why do people bring this up then, any time race is mentioned? It's such a trivial point to make, it doesn't add anything.

Ok, so "black" or "White" are not absolutely clear labels that we can use to describe every single person ever. No shit... Still, Morgan Freeman is black and Margot Robbie is White, and I'm White because both my parents are White, and if there's a serial killer roaming the streets then knowing if he's "black" or "White" is very useful information so I know what to be on the lookout for, etc.

It's like those insufferable people who can't wait to point out that "A tomato is actually a fruit!" any time it comes up in conversation. Ok, so what? "Race is a social construct!" Ok, so what?

What exactly does "social construct" mean?

Are dog breeds a 'social construct'?

Are species a 'social construct'?

Sure, why don't I pop down to the spouse shop and pick one out from their extensive range?

There are almost no marriageable women around these days. Having $ does make getting laid very easy, but I'm not interested in that. Unfortunately it doesn't help at all in finding one of the good ones (perhaps it makes it even harder).

How else would I know what mood to be in?

I sit in my mansion alone refreshing HN and 4chan all day.

It's not much but it passes the time. 50 years to go.

>don't want to have a kid of my own blood. But I want to adopt

Can you elaborate? This is totally alien to me. It basically defeats the point. There must be some monstrous self-loathing involved?

I find it a little unsatisfying when people write these things without telling me roughly what they're worth. "Rich" can vary wildly depending who you ask.

edit: according to another's comment referencing a $56m payout, it now occurs to me that his confusing mention of a $60m figure may have been exactly that

Yes this is an extension of Coulter's Law.

If it was a "White Supremacist" then the headlines would be completely different. The entire race would be unashamedly vilified by the media.

For attacks committed by other racial and religious groups, we see headlines tending more toward vagueness, avoidance of blame, insinuations of mental illness, and - very commonly - the attribution of blame to inanimate objects ("Car slams into crowd at Christmas festival").

That's pretty clearly not the purpose of the war. It will continue until every Ukrainian man - even the elderly, young, disabled and ill - has been brutally maimed and left to die slowly in a field. Every single one. They will continue to be snatched from the streets and dragged from cars and their homes until every single one is gone.

The kind of people who say this about White culture (tennis, golf, chess, etc) cream themselves over the rich vibrant culture of traditional dress in literally any non-White sport or ritual.

If a White professional sumo wrestler insisted on Speedos or boardshorts as a protest against discriminatory Japanese garb, would he be a freedom fighter, in your view? A disrespectful buffoon in mine.

White people are a tiny global minority, and yet everywhere we exist in numbers is currently a target of mass immigration of non-Whites. This is not an accident. Soon there will be nowhere on earth for our people to live in peace and harmony among ourselves.

You're mistaken if you think it's a virtue to ignore this. If you are White, it's disgraceful. If you have White kids, it's unconscionable.

I'm sure you realise that I could turn back all of the things you said on your own position. I see endless demonization, fear-mongering, prohibition, ostracism, censorship and lies about White nationalism than any other movement in the West. Your government hates White people. It misleads you to hate us and to fear White collectivism.

What do I care for freedom if my great grandchildren have no homeland? are despised minorities in a soulless economic zone? are freely assaulted and killed by foreign authorities? don't exist...? That's such a suicidal, nihilistic ideology.

Stronger together indeed. White unity at every opportunity.

This mindset is driven by hatred of White people and ignorance of White achievement and culture. I am White. My children are White. From where I am standing, there is no greater evil than someone righteously trying to erase my kind from the earth. You may not realise that that's what you're preaching, or you may not even care - you may even see it as a moral good, as many people (including many Whites), do nowadays - but that will be a consequence of your ideology. It is therefore my moral right, and indeed my duty, to resist it by any means necessary.

Unfortunately for your cause, we have reached a point where mass non-White migration into "White" nations has occurred for so long now and with such consistently poor and predictable results that many of us are accepting the incontrovertible realities of this process.

Until very recently in human history, there was no real evidence for what kind of society would manifest if people of all different ethnicities were forced into close geographical proximity with an imposed 'harmony' of sorts (of course, previously, any time different tribes came into contact, there would be violent conflict).

We have that picture now. We don't like it. It's a catastrophe. Whether it's terrorism, espionage, nepotism, or even simply subjective cultural differences, multiracialism is a disaster for White people. We know what a supermajority White nation looks like, and we now know what a minority White economic zone looks like, and we are able to make an informed, rational decision on the future we want for our children.

So? You might need to confront the possibility that these are not the evils you've been led to believe they are. It appears they may well be healthy, rational, vital traits for a people to survive and thrive. A population that actively resists or perverts these natural behaviours through xenophilia is not long for this world.

Don't get married, boys

Their best feature - and the one thing that I have most missed for years after moving to Linux - is automatically changing the active mouse profile based on the focused application.

It's so powerful. Any custom buttons for any program, without ever having to think about it. On Linux, without it, I'm stuck manually cycling through the 3 on-board profiles.

>In place of "pig butchering," Interpol proposes the term "romance baiting"

But these are different things. They are strategies for separate components of a scam. Romance is one method of luring the mark, obtaining their trust, motivating them to pay, etc. Pig butchering is one game plan for maximising the profit extracted from the scam.

You can have a romance scam without pig butchering, and you can have a scam that employs pig butchering without any romantic element.

When trying to enter the SPTX address dictated over the phone, I'm only able to get a few digits at a time, but returning to the phone app to press 2 to repeat the address clears all progress in the other app where I'm trying to enter it.

I battled through it and even double checked the address but it still failed.

If that's part of the game, then fair enough, but I'm not doing that again so that's the end of the line for me.

Your piece of paper isn't magic. "Muggles" are free to our psychiatric opinions too. Sometimes it's an advantage to be able to call a spade a spade without the burden of trying to ensure everyone knows how clever we are.

No it doesn't. It depends entirely on "points" having value, which they don't. No woman is going to screw ugly guys for fake internet points, and if she did then her own attractiveness is going to plummet in the eyes of almost all men.

What would she need them for, anyway? Tinder already exists if she wants a NSA night with a guy way out of her league.