RareSoft
RareSoft on Hacker News
Perhaps it's foreshadowing for Java GUIs.
British fans don't have a good reputation in Europe so it's likely the governments way to stop us exporting hooligans.
>Western (US / EU) demand is what drives China's growth.
China's exports are not as much of an influence on it's GDP as you would think. The difference between China and the US is less than 10% of GDP.
China's middle class has grown very wealthy which has undoubtedly reduced China's reliance on exports and stabilized its economy against outside interference.
I agree in priciple but it's only by having money through success that we're able to enjoy those more meaningful aspects of life.
The only group of people that have the luxury of prioritizing those more meaningful things are those with enough assets that they can do whatever they want. Everyone else has to try to keep up.
Were you ever concerned about potential downsides of building an online business linked directly with your real identity?
Have you experienced any downsides to it?
Could Australian ISPs be instructed to just blacklist Google's and Facebook's Ad servers nationally?
Gandhi's “Be the change that you wish to see in the world.” while a little more abstract is essentially the same thing.
Next Amazon will build up a monopoly on Guillotines.
Posted by
RareSoft on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @05:10AM
from the ask-hn dept.
How many job applications do you send on averge per job offer? 100/1? 200/1? 500/1?
Posted by
RareSoft on Monday April 06, 2020 @07:01AM
from the ask-hn dept.
What details of a candidate's CV are most eye catching that you put them forward to the next stage of recruitment?Are there any patterns you generally see from all the resumes of the candidates you put forward for the next stage of recruitment?Also what details stand out such that you don't consider that candidate because of them?
Because people admire their courage in being so transparent about failing publicly. That's undoubtedly helped in building their audience over the last decade not because they want to see SpaceX fail, far from it but because it reminds us that they too are only human and failing is normal no matter how much others try to hide or gloss over their failures.
Base it on just the adult population of around 254 million and it goes up to over $78k/year.
How does nationalising work in the real world in a scenario like this? What happens to the private facility owners?
Urban tree planting is great but there must be a better way of planting trees along pavements.
Everywhere they have been planted the roots have torn up the pavements sometimes causing them to mound over the roots which looks really unsightly and is often a trip hazard. Also on some pavements the trees cause bottlenecks because its too narrow for two people to pass eachother.
Is this not just the world we live in? Personally I agree with you but then I also consider how there are a handful of billionaires with more wealth than a huge portion of the global population and big pharma/ insurance companies charge so much that people are dying because they can't afford medication like Insulin.
If that's the way the world is then why should anyone be expected to behave any differently? It's not right to vilify these people while we give a free pass to everyone else doing equally unethical things.
The issue with that approach though is how do you effectively prevent reinfection of the region when all counter measures are suspended? Another carrier could reinfect the region again and all that previous work came to nothing.
The french state holds a 15% stake in Renault according to Wikipedia so I doubt it's any coincidence.
The government likely wants to give local manufacturers an advantage even if it means not playing fair. I don't know if it's right but I understand why they do it (jobs & tax revenue).