PikachuEXE

I wish I can see more summary, state facts mostly (with sources even they might not be reliable but better than just guessing without source)

The ruling group think they are enlighten more than everyone else and justified to use force/coercion to apply their will on other people (or just an excuse/scam to abuse power)

By distinguishing between propositional, procedural, perspectival, and participatory knowing, he reveals why the current paradigm of AI is not equipped to generate consciousness, agency, or true understanding. This lecture also serves as a moral call to action: if we want wise machines, we must first become wiser ourselves.

00:00 Introduction: AI, AGI, and the Nature of Intelligence 02:00 What is General Intelligence? 04:30 LLMs and the Illusion of Generalization 07:00 The Meta-Problems of Intelligence: Anticipation & Relevance Realization 09:00 Relevance Realization: The Hidden Engine of Intelligence 11:30 How We Filter Reality Through Relevance 14:00 The Limits of LLMs: Predicting Text vs. Anticipating Reality 17:00 Four Kinds of Knowing: Propositional, Procedural, Perspectival, Participatory 23:00 Embodiment, Consciousness, and Narrative Identity 27:00 The Role of Attention, Care, and Autopoiesis 31:00 Culture as Niche Construction 34:00 Why AI Can’t Participate in Meaning 37:00 The Missing Dimensions in LLMs 40:00 Rationality vs. Reasonableness 43:00 Self-Deception, Bias, and the Need for Self-Correction 46:00 Caring About How You Care: The Core of Rationality 48:00 Wisdom: Aligning Multiple Selves and Temporal Scales 53:00 The Social Obligation to Cultivate Wisdom 55:00 Alter: Cultivating Wisdom in an AI Future

https://youtu.be/HAJclcj25uM

I do translations of long podcasts from time to time and it's never accurate and often produces hallucination(I know enough in both languages just using LLM to speed up

I self-host it

On server side I think I handle it in reverse proxy and/or CDN.

Client side I don't see anything HTTP/3 related yet.

AFAIK many are moving due to content might be used to train AI models.

Exposing the Sustainable Development Goals

https://youtu.be/ZW2tkK52U-o

We are halfway through a plot to seize control of the world. It may seem like a conspiracy theory, but it's placed awfully prominently, and everywhere, to be such a thing. The United Nations Agenda 2030 is a sweeping program to take control of our entire world. It launched in 2015 with an ambitious "17 Goals to Transform our World" and 169 targets to hit by the year 2030. That was eight years ago, and we can get a sense of how it's going. Badly. Tyrannically. Farcically. Reading from the Agenda announcement itself, in this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay introduces the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of United Nations Agenda 2030 and shows how every one of them grants the pretext to seize control over the world and all human life and activity in it. Join him to know your enemy.

https://newdiscourses.com/2021/10/sustainability-tyranny-21s...

Sustainability is going to be the buzzword of the century. Everywhere we turn, we hear about sustainable practices in business and industry, sustainable foods and agriculture, sustainable energy, and so on. Businesses and governments sign on to “Sustainable Development Goals,” and so civil responsibility is framed in terms of this seemingly simple idea: sustainability. What does sustainability entail, though? What informs it? In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, James Lindsay walks through Herbert Marcuse’s New Leftism of the 1960s and 1970s and explains how sustainability has become Marcuse’s “New Sensibility.” In other words, sustainability is the new way of thinking about the world so that we can have liberation, which is to say Communism. Join James in this groundbreaking episode of the New Discourses Podcast to explore this idea at its ominous roots.

https://youtu.be/1A8oyO9LoOo?list=PLZJe-MWy0cYc6g4XGnbAdenV4...

Not using NextCloud for anything else yet though

> The security vulnerability was found within 1Password for macOS and targets users of all 1Password 8 for Mac versions before 8.10.36. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to specifically target 1Password for Mac users and convince them to run malicious software on their computer. An attacker could, the 1Password support posting confirmed, abuse missing macOS-specific inter-process validations in order to impersonate a 1Password browser extension.

> The macOS XNU (macOS kernel) inter-process communication framework is system-native and used by 1Password to enforce ‘hardened runtime’ protections that should prevent tampering with such processes and, therefore, prevent certain types of local attacks from taking place. The Robinhood Red Team hackers found a way around this protection during an independent security assessment of 1Password for Mac.

Did maintainers make any promise? Even so they can break promises made for some reasons (especially sickness, accidents, etc.). Whatever type of contributions (money, work, feedbacks, etc.) doesn't make maintainers owe any work to contributors unless previously mutually agreed upon.

Be prepared to DIY (PR, fork, other forms) if you are willing to but you don't owe anything to other people unless you choose to and express that explicitly, and that's the same for maintainers.