NatalijaAAD
But I will share here when we're clear sharing :)
Tell HN: If your idea is worth stealing, AI makes it easy. NDA or not
We're a small team. >7 years of R&D, self-funded, friends-and-family money. We solved a hard problem in a way that experts told us couldn't work. Non-obvious architecture — dozens of design decisions that only make sense once you've tried all the alternatives that don't.We got it working. Signed paying customers. Started building a real business. Another large company approached us for...
Ask HN: Anyone fought a big corp over IP theft courts?
Has anyone taken an IP theft/breach of confidence claim to a court?Small software company, big corporate defendant.We're looking at filing in IPEC (UK) - but EU/US experience is also relevant.Would appreciate 20 mins with anyone who's been through the process.
Interactive AAD Benchmarks: Automatic Differentiation for Derivatives Pricing
Accelerating complex Python models by 300x+ – using Claude.ai [video]
Is DeepSeek just a tip of a disruptive iceberg?
There's hype in finance, too - but realistically, with proper developer tools, organisations can achieve over and above the required speeds using the traditional CPUs/GPUs - and without breaking the bank (no pun intended).
Even if one achieves ground-breaking results using an ultra-expensive chip, in no way it means that an average developer will achieve anything like that, even if provided access to cutting-edge quantum computers.
I think there's a lot hiding in the human-computer interface, and the true power of the existing CPU/GPUs is not fully utilised due to the inherent complexities of the programming languages. Needless to say that relatively simple hardware advancements such as vectorisation and multithreading, are rarely used to full extent in popular languages such as C++ or Python.
My bet is that the ROI of any Quantum Development will be negative for decades. So, unless one's planning horison is 10+ years, or you simply don't care for ROI, I'd choose something more mainstream such as CPU/GPU/TPU...
A Python Toolkit >40x faster than Jax, PyTorch and TF (for certain use cases)
PoC or Integration? Or how startups are being used
Essentially, it allows model developers (such as quants in finance, engineers, and ML specialists) to code in Python without needing to think about the performance of repetitive calculations. As we all know, Python is one of the least efficient languages when it comes to complex calculations/simulations - and we help to resolve it. Long story short, with very few tweaks to the code certain types of calculations (such as pricing of derivatives, curve building, computing financial risks, or "small" NNs) can be accelerated by 100+ in Python and x20+ in C++/C#.
We're now looking to add support for Java (but it doesn't have Operator Overloading, so it's tricky), and some customers are asking to support GPU - which is a bit tricky because it's got a closed instruction set.