MuddyMo
Hey, nobody reads my blog: muddymo.blogspot.com (well, a few do) but I will link you on my blogroll. Send me an email when you are ready.
Architecture of Detention
Polar Mesospheric Clouds "exquisite thermometer" for CO2 effects
Ask.com privacy "eraser" misses a few spots
Exxon Still Funding Climate Change Deniers
Airlines will soon offer WiFi. Is this a good thing?
I recognize some of my struggles in that piece. People get tired of me saying it, but I don't care:
"Chose your semantics wisely, for they do have consequences."
Ironic that in a discipline which requires such a high degree of precision in the use of its symbols and tokens consistently prescribes obscure and contradictory rules for their usage.
Although not required, success in this field is enhanced if one possesses the ability to mentally manage symbol sets with a fairly agnostic attitude towards their clarity and consistency.
When I was a newbie, I recall more than one veteran C programmer giving me a quizzical look when I asked who the hell thought it was a good idea to use the same symbol to express assignment and equality.
Just to see for myself, I went to the Wiki page for Gary Weiss' bio and saw numerous attempts had been made to add a link to this Register article and all had been undone immediately.
Hopefully, Citizendium (like Wikipedia, but no anonymous editors and there is an editorial board) will be able to gain some traction:
Wikipedia black helicopters circle Utah's Traverse Mountain
Boy Survives Moose Attack Thanks To World Of Warcraft
Microsoft kills Vista's anti-piracy kill switch
Facebook Users Raise Privacy Complaints
Funny is fine, just skip it when it involves haranguing, smearing or ridiculing specific politicians, ideologies or religions.
Might this be the milestone we look back on and eval: (not (not (= google evil)))
I assume that means GMail Drive?
Code Changes to prepare GMail for the Future
Seems unlikely that the "viral potential" for a given random web app could be gleaned by perusing the code or that there will soon be technology available to simulate a user. And if you were to reduce the randomness by somehow requiring the code or the app to conform to some standard in order to make it easier to automate the perusal, well we already have a whole SEO industry dedicated to gaming the current automated search technology, don't we?
At some point don't you think it is likely that the social networking application model will be co-opted by market testing enterprises who will design ways to entice lots of people to test software applications while having their physiological reactions captured online. With a record of human reactions directly correlated to a specific application, predictive results from automated searching would then be feasible.