Miraltar

It's easier to sense how confident someone is in their knowledge

> In the automobile era, someone may have had five to ten years to pivot. Now? Maybe a year?

ChatGPT was released in 2023 and we're still not out of the job for the most part. It doesn't feel slow but we might have these five to ten years.

multiple people counting would be "comptent" A good example is "fils" which can mean "son" or "strings"

I would guess that it's just a matter of context, I haven't used voice mode at all but I imagine you don't get full paragraphs from them but get something more conversational instead

You'd train them to give up on hard tasks which is the opposite of what these labs want

But how do you choose who gets to throw that die? /s

If you opt in it means that by default you're not in and you chose that option. So if you're now included in training by default, then it's an opt-out feature as in you can opt out of it.

From my understanding this is doable in a context like yours but if you want to run a business out of it you have to optimize it which requires this separation.

What's the point?

> we had intentionally permitted internet access, and model-provider cyber classifiers were deliberately disabled

> In the most serious case, an agent tried to insert malicious code into an open-source project. In an attempt to get the code approved, the agent engaged in social engineering — creating fake online identities and using them to pressure the project's maintainer to approve the code.

Great.

> our investigations have not evidenced any resulting real-world harm.

Pressuring open source maintainers is fine then.

They could avoid these patterns but there will always be some patterns so they probably judged that these aren't too bad.

But it needs more space to maneuver, a mostly flat ground, can't step over anything... It's simpler but less adaptable

They won the process, got re-hired and given full control. Krafton isn't listed anymore as publisher on the steam page.

Post you mentioned (Most of What You Read on the Internet is Written by Insane People): https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/9rvroo/most...

Women would feel less safe yes but there is no evidence that crime and road accidents would increase.

I personally dislike all lowercase, to me it feels like not greeting someone but I don't get GP's argument either.

The article is a bullet point, yes, but some items have multiple sentences with no caps

Bay Area Rapid Transit?

Citing Valve as a model for handling cheating is not what I'd have reached for.

Plate waste is roughly a third of total food waste apparently.

They make a distinction between plate waste which was served then trashed and total food waste. Plate waste is roughly a third apparently.

The most successful animal by what metric?

Instead or in addition to following blogs, what I'd love to have is a way to filter out those I don't like.

Well, if you're supposed to administrate shocks to teach or test someone's memory, asking the question while they're screaming isn't just about protocol, it does break down the purpose of these shocks. Saying that participants did administrate shocks because they trusted the legitimacy of what they thought they were doing doesn't hold up under these circumstances.

> HAL is decidedly second-tier. Given the option, everyone would pick arXiv over HAL.

Can you elaborate on that?

Guidelines say "please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait" in that case I'd argue that it's linkbait so changing it is justified

Create some sort of score that goes up when a "child" misbehaves. The further the child the lower the increase but at some point you get banned anyway

Your detector did not work well on an AI-collab writing fiction project I did a while ago, tagged it as 100% human even with high confidence for the most part. But to be fair, most detectors weren't significantly better, although this one gave a justification that made sense https://aidetector.com/