Mike_123456

> There is no evidence that cannabis kills brain cells

Search on Google Scholar for "neurotoxicity of cannabis". There is evidence for and against. It is debatable.

> Despite what you may believe, being stoned is not a type of brain damage.

Schizophrenia and psychosis in general is not "getting stoned". That outcome strongly indicates neurotoxicity.

Apologies for the harsh confrontational tone in my previous comments.

Here's a point I was trying to make earlier:

The statement: "Led Zeppelin is better than the Beatles" is subjective because it expresses an opinion that is open to interpretation.

The statement: "I have a preference for Led Zeppelin versus the Beatles" is objective, because it is a statement of fact about your personal experience, and is not subject to interpretation or debate. It also doesn't require "data" or cited research.

If I smoke weed, and it causes cognitive impairment such that I am unable to perform certain tasks (such as driving, or my job, or an exam, or schizophrenia, etc), then that is an objective observable result. No citation or data required.

This is such a simple concept.

> Personal experience is subjective.

Tell that to a schizophrenic who is prescribed medication. Seriously how are you so confused about such a basic concept?