News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

MikePeters

Hi Steve,

Yes - IPv6 is supported

We currently test from three locations. A site is considered "down", only when the majority of the probes reach an agreement. This helps us avoid false positives due to local routing issues.

Re:Thin Websites Sell More on Tuesday July 24, 2007 @11:34AM (#36357)
Dood, thank you for the kind words.

It's been working (big time) for us ever since we switched all landing pages to a "thin" design.

And no, we don't promote a cheaply-designed diet-pill website. SEO-driven, yes. Money-making, yes.

Re:Thin Websites Sell More on Monday July 23, 2007 @10:25PM (#36254)
Bravo! Couldn't have said it better myself.

BTW - I love what you did with PhotoFlock.

Re:Thin Websites Sell More on Monday July 23, 2007 @09:08PM (#36239)
Thank you Ed for the excellent post!

While it is true CNN, Digg, CNet and others have chosen to switch to 1024x768, these sites target a different profile of users than the target demographics for our study.

SoftwareProjects is in the business of building websites that "sell". And by sell I am referring to the ability to convert an anonymous website visitor who is visiting a new website for the first time, into a qualified lead and then a paying customer.

Users frequenting Digg and CNet are in a completely different mindset, than someone looking to get a mortgage quote, or a user who is surfing the net looking for a new bookshelf.

For these type of websites, promoting a specific product/service, it's been shown you typically have 4 seconds to convince the user to stick around, before they hit the BACK button.

Our research conversion data shows users were more comfortable with buying when presented with a thin website.

If you examine popular retail sites targeting the average Internet user, you'll find they all follow a similar paradigm: Overstock.com, Target.com, BuyOwner.com, WalMart.com etc. - are all designed as "thin" sites, deliberately not utilizing the entire width of the page.