News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

M4R5H4LL

I am also very cautious with people who tell me something impossible when I can trust my engineering skills and get a good sense that there is potentially a good outcome. In my experience, it simply means they don’t know how to do it, or are frustrated they couldn’t do it themselves and get into the spotlight.
Re:Why Software Factories Fail on Thursday July 23, 2026 @02:02PM (#49025684)
[flagged]
Such a cringy and unpleasant statement... OP is smart to adjust to change. I have hand-written software for the past 30 years, and the moment I stop using my IDE, you’d tell me don’t know what I am doing?? Dude, I probably was writing assembly code by hand when there were no IDEs and you were still trying to figure out the taste of Play-Doh. Some people really need to put their head in the right place.
Re:DuckDB Internals: Why Is DuckDB Fast? (Part 1) on Friday June 19, 2026 @02:17PM (#48601456)
I’ve enjoyed reading that article a lot. I have used DuckDB as a tool in a code assistant and I am very happy with what I see so far.
Re:Show HN: .Net/C# TUI framework (used Claude) on Tuesday June 02, 2026 @12:41AM (#48366155)
What would you like to see?
Re:The Cost of Owning a Home on Tuesday May 26, 2026 @12:37PM (#48282113)
With a mortgage, you are forced to save money. In other words you have no way around being disciplined. So yes in theory you could probably make more money with aggressive investing, but chances are most people would risk too much and lose a lot and never have the mental discipline of saving the excess they have no matter what happens in their life.
Re:GPT-5.5 on Thursday April 23, 2026 @04:17PM (#47881255)
I am a heavy Claude Code user. I just tried using Codex with 5.4 (as a Plus user I don't have access to 5.5 yet), and it was quite underwhelming. The app stopped regularly much earlier than what I wanted. It also claimed to have fixed issues when it did not; this is not a hallmark of GPT, and Opus has similar issues, but Claude will not make the same mistake three times in a row. It is unusable at the moment, while Claude allows me do get real work done on a daily basis. Until then...
Re:Starlink Mini as a Failover on Tuesday March 17, 2026 @01:21AM (#47408955)
Thanks for this. Can you still use it on heavy rainy days or does it come to a halt?
Re:Starlink Mini as a Failover on Tuesday March 17, 2026 @01:19AM (#47408947)
Good to know. Thank you!
Re:Starlink Mini as a Failover on Monday March 16, 2026 @08:44PM (#47407156)
XFinity has been terrible lately, and I have a Starlink Mini. XFinity failed today, and I did fallback for a few hours on the Mini. Connectivity was actually better than fiber. If only it worked when it is cloudy -- for $50 on roaming, that's a no-brainer given the exorbitant cost of living in northern cal.
Re:Elevated errors on login with Claude Code on Wednesday March 11, 2026 @01:55PM (#47338885)
per ChatGPT, it becomes cost effective (against the $200/mo usage tier) to acquire an RTX 6000 Pro if heavily (+8 hrs/day) after around 2 years (at $0.20/kwh which is lower than cal residential rates). I am interested in alternatives too but I haven't found anything close to Claude Code.
Re:Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions on Thursday February 05, 2026 @01:58PM (#46903449)
From an economic standpoint this is basically machines doing work humans used to do. We’ve already gone through this many times. We built machines that can make stuff orders of magnitude faster than humans, and nobody really argues we should preserve obsolete tools and techniques as a valued human craft. Obviously automation messes with jobs and identity for some people, but historically a large chunk of human labor just gets automated as the tech gets better. So I feel that arguing about whether automation is good or bad in the abstract is a bit beside the point. The more interesting question imho is how people and companies adapt to it, because it’s probably going to happen either way.
Re:Microsoft forced me to switch to Linux on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @11:35AM (#46797650)
I suspect this is less about when Windows declined and more about individual computing journeys. Early exposure (home, school, work) tends to set a baseline that’s hard to shake.
Most production software is wrappers around existing libraries. The relevant question is whether this wrapper adds operational or usability value, not whether it reimplements OCR. If there are architectural or reliability concerns, it’d be more useful to call those out directly.
Thanks for sharing. That would be a nice additional example in .NET with Andy TUI. The library is not Rust but there are a few examples you might be interested in, including a HN client [2] [3].

References:

[1] https://github.com/rivoli-ai/andy-tui2

[2] https://github.com/rivoli-ai/andy-tui2/blob/main/examples/An...

[3] https://imgur.com/a/CgECRa2

Re:Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor on Friday January 16, 2026 @08:48PM (#46654519)
yes, I couldn't tell the difference. What matters to me is to not see the pixels, and the size of the canvas. I am running the XDR at 60% brightness.
Re:Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor on Friday January 16, 2026 @08:44PM (#46654498)
yes, someone got it from a family member, and had no use for it, and sold it to me as is. It was brand new, unopened and in original packaging.
Re:Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor on Friday January 16, 2026 @02:26PM (#46650923)
I have the Apple 6K 32” Pro Display XDR and a Kuycon 5K 27”. Both are great. Apple was $6,500 and the Chinese version was $400 on EBay plus the $100 stand. Kuycon has more types of input, and a remote. Frame and display quality are on par for a dev.
Same for me
Re:Wrapping My Head Around AI Wrappers on Thursday November 20, 2025 @12:37PM (#45995277)
I believe the controversy arises from the notion of “little effort” and critics who have never independently pushed anything to market. It comes across as dismissive and arrogant simply because someone exudes excessive confidence in a limited set of skills. I can personally attest to the immense demands of building a successful business, and it’s evident that very few individuals possess the capability to achieve that. Therefore, while it may provide comfort to avoid challenging oneself and dismiss others’ total work, it ultimately doesn’t benefit anyone and feels more like a self-serving “I could, but I never will” attitude.
Re:.NET 10 on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @02:30PM (#45905036)
Enterprise doesn’t spawn 10,000 containers to perform a simple “hello world” operation. That’s not how it operates. You’d be amazed at how many concurrent requests a single service can handle. This capacity must align with the actual requirements of the companies involved, not some unrealistic scenario like “we need to emulate Google.”
Re:INapGPU: Text-mode graphics card, using only TTL gates on Sunday September 21, 2025 @10:21PM (#45328521)
Great work. I miss the speed we had before graphics card were a thing. Everything was literally 100x faster to render. I wish we could bypass graphics card entirely on modern Oses and computers but it looks like it’s not even possible anymore with EUFI. I would buy a card that works for TUI only, and with a large set of Unicode chars, and works on a 6K screen.
Re:Qodo CLI agent scores 71.2% on SWE-bench Verified on Tuesday August 12, 2025 @11:10AM (#44877257)
Labeling them as “wrappers” and “niche business” indicates a strong cognitive bias already. Value can be created on both sides of the equation.
thanks for brightening the day :)
This is anecdotal but here is the truth: I have a home that I bought around 20 years ago in Cali, and the HOA tripled during that time and is now rapidly approaching $700/mo. And that's with less benefits since we lost the earthquake insurance. And not to mention the special assessments that started showing up in 2025. You could make all sort of assumptions, but there is nothing special about the community.
Re:Open models by OpenAI on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @06:35PM (#44805339)
+1 - I work in finance, and there's no way we're sending our data and code outside the organization. We have our own H100s.
I think you're missing the point entirely. Yes, it's easy to reproduce 5% of the effort. But it doesn't make sense to call the whole 100% of the effort a toy application. Given market pressure, and if it was the case, we'd be flooded with applications like that. Being the master of 5% of the effort doesn't amount to much, and dismissing the other 95% as a toy when it requires a lot more work and as much expertise throughout doesn't make much sense. Drawing an airplane doesn't make it fly.
Why not finish, publish it to the store and get income if it was that straightforward? There's a long way to go between a toy application to demonstrate a product, and something on shelves actually selling. In other words, you can most often quickly tackle the concept or trivial parts of an app, but it's much harder to get a real product out, even if the implementation looks straightforward on surface.
Re:I built a hardware processor that runs Python on Monday April 28, 2025 @01:35PM (#43823939)
I love this kind of project, this is wonderful work. I guess the challenge is to now make it work for general purpose Python. In any case it looks very much like a marketable product already. I would seek financing to see how far this can go.

Older »