News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

LisaG

Re:You Can’t Do Data Science in a GUI on Sunday April 15, 2018 @08:24PM (#16845845)
Also, the article does state what Hadley's take on the question is: "As Wickham defines data science as “the process by which data becomes understanding, knowledge, and insight”, he advocates using data science tools where value is gained from iteration, surprise, reproducibility, and scalability. In particular, he argues that being a data scientist and being programmer are not mutually exclusive and that using a programming language helps data scientists towards understanding the real signal within their data. "
Re:You Can’t Do Data Science in a GUI on Sunday April 15, 2018 @08:17PM (#16845815)
Did you watch all of Hadley's video? You might get the title more if you saw/see the whole talk :)
As long as you obey robots.txt there is nothing wrong with crawling. Your code in GitHub doesn't give any indication of what sites you collect data from so there is no indication that you are scraping instead of using it to crawl in an acceptable manner. Though it wouldn't hurt to label your work as crawler scripts instead of scraping scripts ;)

Why use your own scripts and not Nutch?

Do you know about Common Crawl? https://aws.amazon.com/public-datasets/common-crawl/ It obeys robots.txt so it may not have everything you want, but it could save you part of the effort of crawling yourself.

Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2015) on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @04:31PM (#9814929)
San Francisco CA Full-time / Onsite

New, somewhat stealth startup, for profit company focused on social good.

We have a very talented team so far comprised of : full stack web dev, data architect, 2 junior software engineers, CTO, CEO (me), 2 marketing people, and a business operations person.

We are looking to add a designer and devops.

We work out of the top floor of my house for now - it is a comfortable space. We have funding. The team members we have so far are wonderful to work with, everyone gets along well, and we all feel like what we are building is work that matters.

Please email me if you want to hear more about the team, the stack, and the product.

Re:Glove: Global vectors for word representation on Thursday August 07, 2014 @06:13PM (#8150400)
So excited so see Common Crawl data be useful for such fascinating work!

I work at Common Crawl :)

Re:Show HN: Bitcoin Powered Jukebox. Proceeds go to Charity on Wednesday July 23, 2014 @02:23PM (#8076014)
Love this idea!!
Re:Why Aren't We Reading Turing? on Wednesday April 02, 2014 @03:17PM (#7518222)
Great question and great blog post! I am looking forward to reading the Homay King stuff that uses Queer Theory and will probably reread Computing Machinery and Intelligence more thoroughly.
I played around with Prismatic before but it just didn’t grab me and I found I didn’t use it that much.

This new version is a whole different animal. Not only is it much prettier (great design) but they seem to have seriously improved their relevance algorithms. I would be very interested to hear from their data team why the relevance is so much better now - anyone from Prismatic monitoring these comments?

Re:102TB of New Crawl Data Available on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @06:08PM (#6811843)
There will be news about a subset sometime next month!
If you don't feel like reading the paper Sebastian wrote on the Common Crawl data, he gives a summary of his findings in this video.

Link to full paper: http://bit.ly/14dxSJq

Re:A Look Inside Our 210TB 2012 Web Corpus on Tuesday August 13, 2013 @10:42PM (#6209678)
We do think it is worth it to avoid duplicative efforts.

Suppose you crawl 3 million pages and you pay for the compute and storage costs. Then the next person who wants crawl data goes through the same effort and pays the same costs. Doesn't it make much more sense to have a common pool of open data that everyone can use? Even if the effort and costs are low, they are not zero.

For the smaller frequent crawl, we are working with Mozilla and we are will do the top pages (top according to Alexa).

Re:A Look Inside Our 210TB 2012 Web Corpus on Tuesday August 13, 2013 @10:29PM (#6209647)
Internet Archive (currently) doesn't want to put their data on any cloud service. We believe it is crucial that people can easily access and analyze the data so we put it on various cloud platforms. We are talking with a few organizations about getting data donations that we could put in our corpus and make available to everyone, but nothing is settled enough that I can publicly comment on those potential partnerships yet.
Re:A Look Inside Our 210TB 2012 Web Corpus on Tuesday August 13, 2013 @07:02PM (#6208864)
Limited resources are the only reason. We are working on a subset crawl of ~3 million pages that will be published weekly starting two weeks from now. But doing the full crawl takes a lot of time, effort and money.
Re:Antibiotic resistance: The last resort on Saturday July 27, 2013 @04:38PM (#6114351)
That's interesting. We also could revive phage therapy which uses bacteriophages (viruses that replicate in bacteria).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phage_therapy

Re:Google Fiber coming to Austin on Saturday April 06, 2013 @06:17PM (#5505259)
If you are bored in the San Francisco Bay Area the problem is likely internal rather than where you live, so moving (even to somewhere awesome like Austin) will not resolve it.
I hope that some of you who use/play around with the Common Crawl data will try out using the JSON files from the URL Search and then share your code.

If you didn't see the details in the blog post, Common Crawl is giving out $100 in AWS credit to the first five people who share code that incorporates a JSON file from the URL Search.

"Done" is better than "perfect" should be on a sign hanging in every startup.
Thanks for the catch Djoerd! We will fix it now
From @djoerd Why does @CommonCrawl URL search (http://urlsearch.commoncrawl.org/ ) need 'tld.domain' format rather than 'domain.tld'? Read Google's BigTable paper.
Re:How To Date Like An Entrepreneur on Friday January 11, 2013 @05:20PM (#5045418)
Love this post! Only thing I disagree with is that you only need on to say yes. The first yes might not be the best match for you. Compatibility is not quite as important in business as it is in romantic and sexual relationships.

Older »