News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Kudzu_Bob

Re:Ask HN: Has anyone hacked seduction? on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @01:43AM (#6480864)
All your answers are here:

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/

Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @01:26AM (#6480808)
No, I don't want to address a question posed in bad faith.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @01:25AM (#6480805)
Simply Google "gould" and "fraud" and you will have hours of fascinating reading.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @01:20AM (#6480783)
It's the thing that blank slatists say can be improved by a better environment when they're not busy claiming that it can't be measured.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @01:07AM (#6480736)
Gould has been exposed as a fraud.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @01:06AM (#6480732)
The average IQ produced by natural selection depends on the environment. There is no ideal level of intelligence apart from environment. If the Earth had a uniform climate, terrain, and so on from pole to pole, this presumably would not be the case.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @12:56AM (#6480705)
Human personality contains any number of traits that can be measured. To pretend that pyschometrics does not exist is the equivalent of refusing to look through Galileo's telescope.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @12:50AM (#6480683)
When you say that some of the best hacker and hustlers that you know come from unimpressive backgrounds, does "some" mean "most" or "a few" or "hardly any"?
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @12:46AM (#6480663)
If a wolf is raised by humans, how much will that improve its IQ score?
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @12:31AM (#6480617)
A 100 to 115 IQ maxed out on potential will get you very far in life, but not as far as a 130 to 145 IQ maxed out on potential will.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @12:28AM (#6480613)
We do have concrete ways to measure intelligence, and have had them for over a hundred years. The literature on this subject is quite extensive.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @12:13AM (#6480578)
You should write that up and submit it to Slate. I'm sure that they would publish it.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by conversation on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @12:05AM (#6480550)
I guess poor children hear fewer words because they don't watch much television.
Re:Money on the Mind [video] on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @10:31PM (#6448568)
And what those not-so-wealthy people need is money for drugs.
Sexbots.
Re:Youngest kid, smartest kid? on Saturday September 21, 2013 @01:08AM (#6422065)
Memory places things in context. We don't even know what we know unless we can remember it.
Re:Ask HN: How to win your dream girl? on Thursday September 19, 2013 @11:13PM (#6415753)
All your answers reside here: http://heartiste.wordpress.com/
Re:How a law to fight the Mafia could stop patent trolls on Wednesday September 18, 2013 @12:54AM (#6403578)
Vidal was the last American. When he died, so did the final traces of the Old Republic.
Re:How a law to fight the Mafia could stop patent trolls on Tuesday September 17, 2013 @10:54PM (#6403149)
There's a reason Gore Vidal used to call this country the United States of Amnesia.
Re:How a law to fight the Mafia could stop patent trolls on Tuesday September 17, 2013 @10:53PM (#6403145)
But doing evil that good may come of it is so much more emotionally satisfying, wouldn't you agree?
Re:The secret of Finland's stellar schools on Tuesday September 17, 2013 @09:57PM (#6402988)
In my opinion a more important effect of this is that the lower class children do not become role models for the other children.
Re:The secret of Finland's stellar schools on Tuesday September 17, 2013 @09:42PM (#6402949)
You seem to labor under the misapprehension that this country should be run for the benefit of the people who already live here as well as their posterity. That's just crazy, as all enlightened thinkers know.
Re:How a law to fight the Mafia could stop patent trolls on Tuesday September 17, 2013 @09:38PM (#6402937)
Declaring patent trolls to be terrorists and sending them to Gitmo or someplace like that to be tortured until they confess to whatever we want them to confess to would also work, I suppose. It surprises me the reporter didn't mention that option.
Re:The secret of Finland's stellar schools on Tuesday September 17, 2013 @03:17PM (#6401264)
I'm confused. If you're saying that Finns do well in school even though nobody forces them to, then they would seem to fit the definition of excellent students to a tee.
Re:The secret of Finland's stellar schools on Tuesday September 17, 2013 @02:03PM (#6400806)
Could the secret to Finland's excellent schools be...Finland's excellent students?
Re:How Detroit went broke on Tuesday September 17, 2013 @01:23AM (#6397727)
I think that that city is too busy trying to keep the white suburbs from seceding, a move that would deprive Atlanta of its tax base, to have time to talk to the likes of me.
Re:How Detroit went broke on Monday September 16, 2013 @09:51PM (#6397134)
I believe that you mean "white flight," not "white plight," but a good catch on your part nonetheless.
Re:How Detroit went broke on Monday September 16, 2013 @09:18PM (#6397017)
Your first statement is an attempt to demonstrate moral superiority and therefore merits no response. Your second statement is misleading, in that it sweeps under the rug how Detroit's descent into poverty mirrored its changing demographics.

You could, of course, attempt to disprove Daniel_Newby's contention that demographics is at the bottom of this. All that you need to do is provide a single counterexample by pointing out an instance--just one will suffice for our purposes--of a city that became richer or that economically speaking at least held its own even as the percentage of blacks comprising its population grew. This seems like a simple enough task.

Re:How Detroit went broke on Monday September 16, 2013 @05:28PM (#6396022)
In other words, one cannot really explain why the Western Roman Empire fell if he cannot account also for how the Eastern Roman Empire managed to last another thousand years.
Re:How Detroit went broke on Monday September 16, 2013 @05:21PM (#6395986)
But I am still left wondering why Pittsburghers not only made different choices than did Detroiters, but made ones that were so vastly superior as to lead to their city's becoming the best town in America even as Detroit transformed itself a post-apocalyptic wasteland whose denizens hunt raccoons for their flesh.

Older »