KFW504
KFW504 on Hacker News
Posted by
KFW504 on Friday April 03, 2015 @11:41AM
from the wsj.com dept.
Posted by
KFW504 on Friday April 03, 2015 @11:40AM
from the wsj.com dept.
Posted by
KFW504 on Friday April 03, 2015 @11:39AM
from the technologyreview.com dept.
Interesting! Thanks for sharing
They say life imitates art...and computers are our art
Posted by
KFW504 on Thursday April 02, 2015 @03:57PM
from the theguardian.com dept.
Posted by
KFW504 on Thursday April 02, 2015 @03:52PM
from the networkworld.com dept.
This is really impressive!
Fair points...D confuses me too!
I think they are suggesting that it's a step toward independence from the smartphone ecosystem
so true - but don't you think that it's only a matter of time? Some of the futuristic applications that we only imagine today are probably not that far away... but I think it is misguided to limit wearable focus to watches.
Interesting article on the topic: http://www.economist.com/news/business/21646225-smartwatches...
Posted by
KFW504 on Thursday April 02, 2015 @01:28AM
from the theguardian.com dept.
You know what's interesting, there's also the other side of the tech-products coin where they are designed with a certain lifespan in mind...'designed to fail' is too harsh, but certain products could be way more sustainable than they are.
In some ways, I can understand the nobility of an MVP mentality, because it's theoretically striving for more...but these others, I'm not so sure.
Then again, what do you think the net economic impact is of each of these tactics? Could be good if you think about it...
Agreed - this is amazing, but speed to scale comes with clarity for the masses
I'm with you - though wouldn't be the first time that nostalgia rather than facts drove naming...
well, they aren't exactly priced on a cost basis
"Loneliness centres on the act of being seen. When a person is lonely, they long to be witnessed, accepted, desired, at the same time as becoming intensely wary of exposure."
We are all walking the line of putting ourselves out there enough in a meaningful, authentic way to feel an organic connection while also combating a fear (that of course varies with the individual) of vulnerability.
The internet provides a little sugar high to create an artificial sweetness of connectivity but fails to (on its own) provide the nutrients needed for a healthy, complete life.
pretty good proxy for life advice, am I right?
I'm with you - it's also extraordinarily obvious given the level of detail/explored regions represented - relatively surprising that the author did this given the level of detail the article goes into...but may not have been her call though
Creating a safe space seems very reasonable, but I'm not sure I agree that the implication is that the remaining space is therefore fundamentally "unsafe." Emotional topics can definitely benefit from intellectual discussion, but it is not unreasonable to say that a portion of the population may very well not want to be a part of it
at the end of the day, it's art...'fair value' is a very unique construct
the main point I was making was that comparing 20 years ago to today in this case is likely not equivalent (at best I would say it's an incomplete view)
What's the turnover rate at your co-working space? If people aren't working there for any significant period of time, you might not be able to develop the same type of meaningful interactions you'd hope for in an office.
One thing to focus on is that the rate per song in the CD era can't fairly be compared to the rate per song today - particularly for popular songs that have a global reach. I would agree that "per play" is only a partial metric, but would caution against trying to compare too much over time.
It seems there may also be an additional (and potentially larger) cultural element here that goes beyond language, though it would be less pronounced at such an elementary age. Further, it would be interesting to explore how this family's experience maps to first-generation American families in the US.