Joseph-Stalin
This is despite the fact I also think tailwind is the right choice, and I'll be living my life as if tailwind is the modern replacement for bootstrap.
> Tailwind has large (200kb) JS payloads
My tailwind deployment is 7kb css (before gzip+min) and 0kb js (0 files).
But that aside, there are known studies that statistically speaking, users leave if your page is slower.
> Senior leaders care about cost, not artistry, when assessing technical decisions
so we'll continue using the thing that existed before tailwind, then? I think my CEO would get mad and fire me if I rewrote all my bootstrap stuff into tailwind.
I would really like to read articles that give strong arguments in favor of using tailwind.
Ruqqus, an open source Reddit clone, is shutting down their main instance
Lemmy is written in rust, so that is surprising, but it also a react SPA so feels heavy to me when I tried it.
Ask HN: What does a rails/laravel/Django dev need to know about HTTP2/3?
It seems like the only thing a regular webdev can do with http2 is update their nginx and maybe use a CDN. But I remember reading people talking about replacing websockets with http2. Where is all that stuff? I've seen nothing in the docs for http2+ features in any MVC framework.