CravingLogic

I just realized my original comment can be read in two ways. I was focusing on the blatant llm-sourced content. I don't think the author has even read this article so I doubt they discovered or learned anything.

I just don't understand how people continue to do this. Are we really going to try and sell thoughtless articles as our own? With the same 4 fill-in-the-blank sentence structures?

Who is impressed by this? What purpose does this serve?

Publications like this really undermine and sour academia. It's the same thing that happened to journalism.

This feels strange. I always go to this page by default almost every day. I'm curious what the rest of the community thinks.

I'm curious what the motivation was for doing this now after supporting faker.js for 8+ years.

Also, isn't faker.js a completed project? What is there to maintain?

Those certainly create a nice narrative.

100% Agree. There are 6 ridiculous reasons why click-bait titles are broken.

If you just want a csv of all your playlists right now, instead of potentially "30 days". This repo works well.

https://github.com/pavel-aicradle/exportify

I'd bet that more than 95% of the US population would equate those two terms.