ColinCochrane
I'm inclined to believe this is an example of the system working as intended. A complaint was filed and now the public has their opportunity to voice their opinions in response.
[0] https://applications.crtc.gc.ca/instances-proceedings/Defaul...
> 'In the modern-day vernacular, people often refer to a criminal case “being thrown out”. Obviously, this is little more than a figurative expression. Cases aren’t actually thrown out, in the literal or physical sense. Nevertheless, in the specific circumstances of this case, the Court is inclined to actually take the file and throw it out the window, which is the only way to adequately express my bewilderment with the fact that Mr. Epstein was subjected to an arrest and a fulsome criminal prosecution. Alas, the courtrooms of the Montreal courthouse do not have windows.'
Others Will Follow – SciFi Short
Martin Shkreli headed to jail after Hillary Clinton threats
First meaningful paint: 8,820 ms
First Interactive : 11,420 ms
Those are brutal numbers for just about anything, let alone a simple blog post.LHC double heavy particle to shine light on strong force
Man Buys Two Metric Tons of Lego Bricks; Sorts Them via Machine Learning
At His Own Wake, Celebrating Life and the Gift of Death
1) What if your passenger was using your phone?
2) What if you using voice-commands to send a text (especially if via CarPlay, etc...)?
Problems of Matrix Organizations (1978)
That is brutal. I don't understand how someone could be so tone-deaf, especially in a job interview.
If You’re Going Through Hell
That's not to say I disagree with the content of the article. I think it presents a good approach to promoting improvements to processes, the key takeaways being:
1) Observe the process and try to understand all aspects of it (not just that which affects you).
2) If you still feel that it can be improved, come up with a plan to improve and implement the process in a limited scope over which you have control.
3) If successful, break down why it was successful, and evaluate whether it is suitable to be expanded to the general case.
4) Find the owner of the existing process to discuss it with them, and present your proposed improvements.
I think there's an argument to be made that you should talk to the owner of the process before you start coming up with improvements, which could save some time on understanding it. But I suppose that depends on the situation.
Edward Snowden Demonstrates How Easy It Is to Hack a Voting Machine
Starlite
'Essentially witchcraft': A former naturopath takes on her colleagues
Changing Baby's Diaper Now Considered Child Molestation in Arizona
But that's the point of this whole post: If you can't justify being nice for the sake of others, at least be nice for the sake of yourself.
I really like that idea. It's almost like an elevator pitch for each party's platform.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/09/us/09manning.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/who-is-wik...
Beware of the Robot Pharmacist
Sierra Gets Creative
The NHL, while certainly not as popular as the NFL or MLB, is pretty consistent as far as attendance numbers go, comparable to the NBA [2]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Soccer_attendance...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Soccer_attendance...
Store shelves that are well-stocked, like those in this bakery near Zerpa’s house, are typically full of non-essential items set at sky-high prices