News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

CaffeineLD50

Re:How Should We Think About the Renaissance? on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:54PM (#44195682)
I am unaware of any such warning nor do I know what a flamewar style is.

Ban away. I don't need you.

Re:The impossible predicament of the death newts on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:51PM (#44195662)
Indeed
Re:Google restricts Android sideloading on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:50PM (#44195650)
I use signal. Don't need.
Re:Google restricts Android sideloading on Thursday June 05, 2025 @01:55PM (#44194022)
Murena has a preloaded fork.

Easy

Re:Google restricts Android sideloading on Thursday June 05, 2025 @01:54PM (#44194013)
I'm pretty sure my degoogled Murena /e/ OS pixel 5 won't have this problem.
Re:The impossible predicament of the death newts on Thursday June 05, 2025 @01:53PM (#44194007)
I'm pretty sure my degoogled Murena /e/ OS pixel 5 won't have this problem.
Re:How Should We Think About the Renaissance? on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @09:15PM (#44187355)
Destroying livelihoods leads to self injury and death. But yes, Mr. Obvious, they are literally different. Touché.

I'm talking about intolerance and demonization. It leads to false criminal charges which may include death penalties. Is an electrocution literally the same as being burned alive? Nope. What say ye Mr Obvious to that?

Re:How Should We Think About the Renaissance? on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @11:58AM (#44182182)
We still have witch hunts both figuratively and literally - we assign blame to innocent parties and jail or unelect them.

And awareness is irrelevant. When I listened to the golden age of punk rock (IMHO) I didn't need to be aware of it: its self awareness changes nothing

And there was no "field" of witch hunting: but even if it is conceded to be so, what's wrong with a good witch burning and hanging now then?

Now we "cancel" or censor (or on HN down vote 'trolls') which is no different. Intolerance and demonizing just takes different forms in different ages.

I fucking approve!
Re:If you are useful, it doesn't mean you are valued on Monday June 02, 2025 @10:16AM (#44159103)
The use of passive voice and vagueness hides the actors involved: namely management.

But they always have a spreadsheet where they calculate how they can convert your former salary into their bonus.

"Never underestimate (management) greed" - to paraphrase Scarface.

Re:Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH? on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @11:22AM (#43472427)
I beg to differ
Re:Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH? on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @11:21AM (#43472422)
Dozens of news articles report remote workers are quitting instead of RTO and or would quit if forced to do so.

The "practical merits" of unionizing don't matter if you're gonna quit anyway: go for it. It'll probably lose but fuck it, you're gonna quit anyway.

You've got nothing but the chains of the office to lose.

Re:Why I've now quit my Google contract job on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @11:19AM (#43472392)
It doesn't matter- they failed to punish the US, stop supporting Israel, or withdraw from the middle east or whatever their goals were.

Terrorism fails but I never said it was "without effect". Vegans boycotting milk hasn't saved any " enslaved cows" but it has given birth to a robust soy and oatmilk industry

But no cows have been released from their oppression. Not a one

Re:Why I've now quit my Google contract job on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @10:24AM (#43471733)
The Unabomber wanted to end "technological society " but he did manage to improve postal safety standards. Mission accomplished?

If the goal of the 9/11 hijackers was to improve airport security then mission accomplished! But I think their goal was something else.

Clearly you don't read too well

Re:Why I've now quit my Google contract job on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:17PM (#43467532)
Absolutely correct !!

If voting is not coordinated and done in an effective manner its just a 3rd party protest vote "gesture" (in the US w a 2party system )

Re:Triforce – a beamformer for Apple Silicon laptops on Monday March 24, 2025 @07:59PM (#43466708)

  /_\
/_\/_\

Triforcin'

Re:Why I've now quit my Google contract job on Monday March 24, 2025 @07:57PM (#43466688)
Once they starting working federal contracts their fate was sealed

Trump has promised to pull hard on the leash of federal dollars.

If Google want "freedom" it will be free of those federal dollars. I suspect they don't want freedom on those terms

Re:Why I've now quit my Google contract job on Monday March 24, 2025 @07:54PM (#43466671)
People who work at Google may have an influence on that more than those who don't

And are likely to be more motivated anyway as they have skin in the game

Once you quit its not as compelling a problem

Re:Why I've now quit my Google contract job on Monday March 24, 2025 @07:52PM (#43466656)
If there are 10 remote labor contractors waiting for every quitter (equivalent to a strike breaker "scab") how is google hurt at all?

There are many kinds of " strike" and they require planning and thought.

Here's a quick link I quacked:

https://lawbhoomi.com/types-of-strike/

Ineffective action doesn't multiply into effective action.

Gesture based political action has the same problem of terrorism, which is also ineffective, almost certainly for many of the same reasons

Effective action can be had but it requires coordination leadership, strategic thinking - one off or wildcat action may politicize people towards effective action but alone is (sorry to say) pointless

Re:Why I've now quit my Google contract job on Monday March 24, 2025 @06:34PM (#43466094)
DEI as such like racial quotas generally have failed, for what reasons we can guess.

You can protest by quitting but that won't fix anything

Its like vegans "quitting" meat. Not a cow was ever saved by this gesture. There are sufficient cow eaters to make such a gesture irrelevant

That's not saying nothing can be done

But some gestures are just that

Re:Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH? on Monday March 24, 2025 @03:25PM (#43464537)
You are correct down to the last point.

That's not what this poll is about.

Would you do it doesn't need to think about all the possible ways it can fail.

Would you drive a car can be analyzed as a self financing life threatening suicidal act .

Most of us choose to drive for the benefit (s) anyway

Re:Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH? on Monday March 24, 2025 @11:41AM (#43462311)
Unions can be quite useless. No strike clauses can make them basically a paid extension of management.

I'm not suggesting that this would be an existing union.

It might be a wholly new single issue union.

But I hear ya. I've been in useless unions

Re:Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH? on Monday March 24, 2025 @09:48AM (#43461044)
Fair enough. I find it to be lonely and without adaptive management it can be alienating from your peers.

I'm more of a hybrid flexible few days of WFH kinda guy myself

Re:Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH? on Monday March 24, 2025 @09:47AM (#43461032)
No. The other reasons have failed.

Those other reasons will only muddy the waters.

Its WFH or go home...

Once unionized everything is on the table but without a union it's just words.

Re:Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH? on Monday March 24, 2025 @09:45AM (#43460997)
It's a game changer no doubt but unionizing is powerful AND risky.

The benefit must be compelling enough and/or the would be unionizers have to be risk tolerant (i.e. willing to be illegally fired ).

Ask HN: Would You Unionize for WFH?

WFH has proven to be both popular and workable but no union effort has made it their one issue.Unionizing involves a high likelihood of being (illegally) fired for exercising your legal right.Would you risk being fired for the right to use collective bargaining for one benefit alone: the ability to WFH one/some/most/all days of the week?I, for one, would unionize for it. What say ye, you HN...

( Read More... | 18 comments | 7 points | on HN )
A bunch of poseurs I'm sure.
Re:The Worst Programmer I Know (2023) on Sunday March 23, 2025 @10:04PM (#43457343)
A nice write up.

But our AI overlords will need metrics that they can use.

Re:Show HN: LinkedIn sucks, so I built a better one on Sunday March 23, 2025 @10:01PM (#43457336)
Ill check it out.

I agree "LinkedIn sucks".

What is your stance on privacy?

Re:Trapping misbehaving bots in an AI Labyrinth on Saturday March 22, 2025 @09:11PM (#43450150)
And the misbehaved bots follow the path right into the pit and then...the Void of Infinite AI Abyss.

Older »