News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Broge

Re:Would {word1} beat {word2} • Ranked AI game on Thursday March 13, 2025 @09:22PM (#43358781)
Try the Groq free tier or Google free tier, both are pretty generous
Linux soon
Re:We Outsmarted CSGO Cheaters with IdentityLogger on Wednesday October 16, 2024 @03:00PM (#41862575)
Feels disgusting with the hidden fingerprinting but very technically impressive!
Re:Show HN: I built local copilot alternative using Codellama on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @05:41AM (#38377501)
Looks interesting! What are the main differences between this and https://github.com/TabbyML/tabby ?
Re:How to disable Chrome’s new targeted ad tracking on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @11:49PM (#37414544)
Gonna shill my extension one last time to disable ad tracking. Unlike the article's instructions which you'll have to do for each Chrome profile on each computer, you can install it once for each Google account and it follows you everywhere.

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/no-privacy-sandbox...

Re:Show HN: Disable Chrome's Privacy Sandbox Settings on Wednesday September 06, 2023 @05:35AM (#37402987)
Hey everyone,

I got tired of disabling the Privacy Sandbox settings on all of my machines, for every single Chrome profile, so I made a quick extension to keep these settings off.

Source can be found here[1].

Hope this helps someone.

[1] https://github.com/kevin51jiang/no-privacy-sandbox

Seems like the account just posts blogspam.
Re:Ask HN: How would we do a better app store? on Saturday July 22, 2023 @08:00AM (#36825492)
For me probably filters that are actually useful e.g. Top free apps with no ads

Whats annoying is that Google play has all the data to let you do this but they don't let you filter by if it contains ads or not.

Re:Transformers.js on Thursday March 16, 2023 @08:58PM (#35191287)
Looking at the code it seems like it's only running using simd so far. I think the creator said something about the WebGL models being inaccurate when quantized or something.
Re:Transformers.js on Thursday March 16, 2023 @08:39PM (#35191105)
Yes I love being able to run ML models without dealing with Python package management!
Re:Show HN: Graph-based AI for longform writing on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @07:32PM (#34905182)
Regarding the training data, thanks so much! We're definitely gonna be looking into improving and specializing it so it's less... whatever we could come up with at 2AM in the morning.

Now I guess is my time to learn. Why do you think grammarly and gmail help flow? If anything, those red lines make me lose my train of thought.

And finally, regarding DFS, seems like you're right! Fixed!

Once we release for writers, we're planning to tighten up the positioning and make the UX a bit more intuitive.

Re:Show HN: Graph-based AI for longform writing on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @07:22PM (#34905088)
Hey! For the waitlist, cross my fingers, we'll have something in a week or so. Worst case, it'll be within the next month.

If you're fine with the current capabilities, the text is stored in your browser's localstorage, so you should be able to use it.

Regarding the voice, there's no technical barriers, only implementation. It's definitely something we're considering, but please let us know in the waitlist! https://forms.gle/SmrnBgfygCLPXrFK8

Re:Show HN: Graph-based AI for longform writing on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @05:57PM (#34904254)
Thanks for the kind words!

The unlimited part comes from the AI knowing just enough context to stay coherent in any situation. Current long-form text techniques usually just summarize the past n tokens, and maybe the previous summary as well. The problem with this is that it quickly loses specifics of anything that happened just outside the window.

What Jotte's graph-based approach does is have weighted summaries, allowing the important information to stay in there much longer.

Definitely agree that the interface is still pretty rough, but we wanted to just get public reception on this sort of thing. We've done some testing on hyrid dev/writers, but it needs a more rigid structure before we even try to test this on pure writers.

Re:Show HN: Graph-based AI for longform writing on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @04:56PM (#34903496)
Yeah I feel like for development, OBM is great and super flexible.

But when you actually want to deploy, a lot of tiny, more efficient models would probably be the best bet.

I read somewhere that the a company ended up fine-tuning FLAN-T5 instead of going GPT-3, which I can imagine saved them lots of $$.

Show HN: Graph-based AI for longform writing

https://jotte.ai/

Hey everyone, I wanted to share a new tool we've created called Jotte (https://jotte.ai) which we believe can be a game-changer for AI-generated longform writing like novels and research papers.As you may know, current AI like ChatGPT and GPT-3 have a token limit of around 4000 tokens or 3000 words, which limits their effectiveness for longer writing tasks. With Jotte, we've developed a...

( Read More... | 77 comments | on HN )
Re:Riffusion – Stable Diffusion fine-tuned to generate Music on Thursday December 15, 2022 @01:44PM (#34003775)
I wonder if it's possible to fine-tune an image upscaling model on spectrograms, in order to clean up the sound?
Re:Even nuns watch porn, Pope says, warning of risks on Thursday October 27, 2022 @07:39AM (#33356092)
Summary here in case people are interested http://csla.history.ox.ac.uk/record.php?recid=E06900
Out living doesn't imply power though, it only means that it can survive.
What do service workers restrict as compared to the previous model?
Re:A Face Is Exposed for AOL Searcher No. 4417749 (2006) on Wednesday August 24, 2022 @11:26PM (#32589106)
I think you might've posted the wrong link