BogdanCalin
However, thinking logically about the whole HFT business: As I understand it it's something like this:
Let's say I want to buy 100 apples at $1 a piece. A middle man comes and says: I see that you want to buy 100 apples. Let me buy them for you. Here they are (an apple is now $1.001)
Why do I need this middle man to steal from me? You will probably say that they are providing liquidity. It's still stealing and the markets had enough liquidity before the whole HFT gang came.
Maybe I'm wrong, if so please explain me why.
I don't buy the "providing liquidity" defense of HFT.
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/04/03/schwab-on-hft-grow...
Six-Year-Old News Story Causes United Airlines Stock to Plummet (2008)
Google, Wireless Industry Not Down with Marriott’s Wi-Fi Blocking Plan
Are You a Robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA ReCAPTCHA”
WordPress 3.x Persistent Script Injection
Germany's top publisher bows to Google in news licensing row
Hacker's ruinous run ends in capture
Why Google's Waze Is Trading User Data With Local Governments
Cookie Overdose
Google disabled Irongeek's Youtube account for spam
The battle against self-xss
The pitfalls of allowing file uploads on your website
Google AdSense Leak
How we found a directory traversal vulnerability in Rails routes
Rails directory traversal = RCE
They spent on WhatsApp $4B (cash) and $(12+3)B (in stock). $12B is nothing when you have $173B.
If the $173B evaluation is correct, it's a totally different story. But as long as people think it's correct, Facebook can profit and buy any competitor with investor's money.