Antibabelic

The oldest works there are from the 1880s.

What kind of art do you think the MoMA (Museum of Modern Art), houses?

Most of their code is locked behind closed doors.

You can't bring a steak to a vegan potluck and say "Come on guys, we won't get sued over this!"

"AI Use Disclosure: A majority of this code base was crafted by hand without any use of AI (which can be seen from the project's Git history)."

So much for "human programming is obsolete".

It is pedantic. Saying that people should say CPC instead of CCP adds nothing to the conversation. If it grinds your gears then maybe starting with organizations like the Encyclopedia Britannica[0] rather than random Hacker News commenters might prove more effective.

[0] https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinese-Communist-Party

Prolog is a very practical language for particular tasks. Languages are tools that fill different niches.

Besides, people do stay with Prolog. The language has been going strong for many decades. New Prolog projects pop up often. This can't be said for many other unusual languages, which perished in academic obscurity.

Sarcasm?

A language is a set of sentences.

A sentence is a finite sequence of symbols drawn from an alphabet.

In this sense, mathematical operation tables are absolutely a language. As are natural languages.

> Here we ask whether, in a task where gestures are particularly useful—namely, spontaneous demonstration in which no real object is present—speakers of a high-gesture (Italian) and a low-gesture (Dutch) culture show similarities or differences in how they teach to adults versus children.

I don't have an ad blocker on my laptop. The ads I get are pretty much entirely generic and irrelevant to me, I don't remember ever consciously clicking on an ad.

> That human would be turning down a potential Fields Medal for this discovery.

While interesting, this result is not Fields Medal material.

The end result is the same: an SVG file. Definitely doesn't matter to an LLM what produced it.

Second place is small?

I think the parent comment is wondering if it was originally drafted in English and then translated to Latin.

This is a lot of very confident assertions.

> you do decide to actively go against it for decades because you like doing things your way

Perhaps there's a good reason why a developer or a group of developers decide to do things a certain way.

> This is why Krita is sweeping the floor with gimp

Aside from the fact that these programs are intended for pretty different things, the impression I have is that GIMP has a much larger install-base than Krita and more people are aware of it. Far from "sweeping the floor".

> GNOME is hanging on by nature of being the default

Or perhaps some people (and enterprises) want a polished OOTB desktop experience without having to deal with KDE's bugs and Windows-like design language. There are plenty of GNOME installs on Arch Linux for example, where you can't speak of any "defaults" with regards to desktop environments.[0]

[0] https://pkgstats.archlinux.de/fun/Desktop%20Environments/cur...

I don't understand this response. Human artists can and do make SVGs.

My day job is not in the tech industry. I am an editor. Literally nothing has changed for me in the last four years.

Prolog is an elegant abstraction. One of the points of abstractions is that they let us concentrate our optimization efforts in one place. Prolog benefits from many decades of research into how to make it work fast. When your problem does require a Prolog-shaped solution the most sensible thing to do is to use a highly optimized Prolog system instead of reinventing a naive algorithm yourself. Your "inelegant" solution will not be faster.

(This is also the problem with "I'll just quickly implement a Prolog-like DSL when I need it". Sometimes not a bad idea, but you have to be realistic. Your "lightweight" Prolog will be worse in every way compared to serious Prolog implementations).

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerminusDB

[1] https://github.com/terminusdb/terminusdb

Richard O'Keefe in The Craft of Prolog: "Elegance is not optional".

Erlang has very little in common with Prolog, which is a language in an entirely different paradigm (logic programming).

Early versions of Erlang were implemented in Prolog, which is why Erlang's syntax looks a whole lot like Prolog's, but beyond that they're not very similar.

It's not clear to me what you mean, can you elaborate?

... I mean, yes? People object to AI art (and generative AI in general) on ethical grounds, not just aesthetic ones. This is something anti-AI people are quite explicit about.

Is you actually look at the Lisp ecosystem as it exists today (even just Emacs by itself) you'll quickly realize that none of this is true in practice. Other people have pointed this out.[0]

[0] https://applied-langua.ge/posts/lisp-curse-redemption-arc.ht...

They don't offer APIs precisely so that you can't integrate several sources in one app.