AnbeSivam
Part 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTKkY2kZuEw&t=3086s
Oral History of Pat Gelsinger, part 2 of 2
Dissecting the Graphcore IPU Architecture via Microbenchmarking
https://bitfunnel.org/categories/blog/
Introducing Trinity: a modern, high performance, elegant IR(search) library
WebAssembly update
Twitter tests new ad-blocking Reader mode on mobile
A Quantum Leap for the Web ( Firefox with Servo Components by End of 2017 )
John Perry Barlow (EFF Founder) Wellness Fund
Rethinking URL bars as primary browser UI (from a Chrome PM working on PWA)
Can Swift code call C code without overhead?
Debugging unfamiliar code [ Visual Studio ] [ NativeJIT ]
> They claimed 10x the density of DRAM, it is now 4x
> Latency missed by 100x, yes one hundred times, on their claim of 1000x faster, 10x is now promised
> More troubling is endurance, probably the main selling point of this technology over NAND. Again the claim was a 1000x improvement, Intel delivered 1/333rd of that with 3x the endurance.
From this seminar few months back - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXurTRtmfWc ,
I think density can be increased, this is only the initial product,
and latency is contributed more by PCIe/OS/application rather than the underlying 3d-xpoint material. The slides from the article are for the PCIe SSDs, I wonder whether the earlier claimed latency, still holds well with NVRAM.
I wonder why the endurance is so lower than the earlier claims.