News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

ARayOutOfBounds

An agent reviewing its own output has the same blind spots, the same training-data gaps, and a strong bias toward declaring its work "good". But even having a different model review the code is flawed and not good enough, especially for those whose code can't be wrong, like in regulated industries.
Re:How many people still write code by hand? on Thursday July 16, 2026 @05:26AM (#48932204)
Commenting because I'm interested in the answers as well.

Stats say over 90% of engineers use AI to code, but the actual split of manual/AI is harder to say.

Re:Why AI code review is not enough on Thursday July 16, 2026 @05:23AM (#48932184)
Meaty thought piece on why relying on just AI reviewing AI is a bad idea.
Re:Ask HN: What Are You Building with AI? on Wednesday July 15, 2026 @05:48AM (#48918423)
Yes?
Codacy has done this for a while https://www.npmjs.com/package/codacy-cli

And this tool makes it Claude Code native https://www.npmjs.com/package/@codacy/verity-cli

Appreciate it.
Actually, no. This was conceptualized and written entirely by a human. :)

Older »