7OVO7

curiosity... did the guy who freaked out learn about what was happening on the site? I mean: did he freak out in the forum of the site or in real life? (without knowing what was happening on the site)

its good for parsing movie summaries

all to judge the person and not to reason on his words; if I point to the mountain, why are you talking about me? Im pointing to damned mountain, talk about the mountain, damn!

the problem of a free market in the management of the important hubs of a sector (as is Google for most of the services of its type on the internet) is that they (the big names in the sector, those who reach the top with the free market), are which then once they arrive they can do as they prefer.

the problem of a non-free market, in this matter, would be a government monopoly, with the same problem: they can do as they like.

the alternative to this currently is not easily applicable, and does not give the current advantages of the "big" (whether they are companies or governments the result does not change; really, it is the same).

if you think that Russia and its coming private Internet, or the American NSA security system, or even that I know ... Amazon and eBay, or Facebook and its network (not just the Social Network site, but all its additional services, and where it gets to manage what it manages), or even Chinese censorships on the Internet, are different from each other (to give random examples), think again.

then of course comes troll-boss Trump (they ban him from Twitter and other similar sites) and everyone thinks (confused) that this is not real wath I am writing in this comment.

we are beyond the conspiracy, here the conspiracy comes to life by itself, randomly, without anyone creating it; now in its own life.

who is at the top decides for who is below the top, obviously the developers of Droidscript appeal, they do not like this decision, but they are like everyone else they are subject and subject to the "big".

if you don't want big problems from the "bigs", don't support them, don't use them.

the first sensible and rational comment I see here (I hope more comment like this in this post).

no standards = bullshit

any opnions compared to RawTeraphee?

this microblogging platform is clearly crap, it has a vomiting bird as its logo, and follows the trend of those who then arrive at the shit-storm, which is not only illegal, but a clear manifestation of inhumanity; I personally despise any use of the Internet as if it were a defecator or similar, and I hope this platform will fail, for the little good that exists

good for all those suppressed people

these are those articles that in Italy are interpreted as media spam propaganda: women are smarter than men. misleading and inconsistent, and not because I am a male, but because as there are males intellectually superior to other females, there are inevitably females intellectually superior to males, and it is absolutely random and chaotic. if we then discuss what favors or disadvantages the intellect, it is quite another matter.

This PDF is clearly a mocking, derogatory, and provocative article, written by people who are not ... they are not procrastinating, on the contrary, they immediately commit to writing something nonsense against useful reasoning; why is not relevant. the facts are decisive, the facts in this PDF are these:

+ put random sentences that are blatantly meaningless

+ they write the word STUFF as if to mean that whoever is to procrastinate uses this word as an important word

+ do not in any way describe a real experimentation

+ quote someone's phrase without a relative rational sense

+ they put on an image of an hand, clearly provocative, senseless, expressing nothing

these in this article are considered academic-trolls, discrediting the natural method of procrastinating something not essential at the moment

then if we could go and look in the world for all those who are against procrastination we would see just who the directors of these trolls are

procrastination is rationality when applied to something not essential at the moment, it cannot be useful to apply it to everything, it does not refer to everything, and it is relative, like any other method of action, to rationality

there is no rationality in committing to using an academic context to discredit a topic, you are not going anywhere; this is a world that instead of procrastinating what it can to do something else and optimize resources and possibilities, produces 1000 things when 100 are needed, allows 100 companies of a service when not even one would be needed and the service should be managed by those who know how to perform it (such as the Internet: experts and graduates in telecommunications ... what are the others?)

reading this PDF is depressing (I'm sure they had some crazy laughs while writing it).

or maybe I wrong all my comment (this comment) and you can try to procastinato to ∞ any reaction versus me and my comment

its my first comment in this interesting helpfull site, and ... Im not pro or counter vaccines, simply I dont trust people who broken any kind of trust, so, If the international WHO change an important argument, like upsetting it, on the basis of speculations (is irrelevant what speculation are), I dont trust the WHO anymore.

interesting

just a little umh https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/6dbe03438a95bc295ca64d49...