10241024
Converting a car to also run on natural gas costs a few hundred dollars in South America / Europe but after that the benefits are:
- x2 cheaper travel expenses
- less harmful emissions
Since the US is rich in natural gas wouldn't it have been more environmentally conscious to convert the hundreds of millions of petrol cars to also run on natural gas instead of digging up tons of minerals for brand-new electric cars?
This is the 3rd time in this thread this claim is getting repeated. From my previous comment:
"V has an online playground, a package manager, hot code reloading and a REPL whereas Zig doesn't even though Zig is twice as old."
If you can't provide examples of undelivered features, I'm going to have to say you're spreading lies.
Also literally in the HN thread you shared the author of V refuted the claims from the article.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31793554
(Ctrl+F amedvednikov)
But I agree 100% - having a blog post that refutes all the claims in one place would be very useful.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27442724
I wouldn't call the author an objective reviewer of the language.
Also even in this thread there were people spreading lies about the language:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33544205
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33544576
who have a history of spreading lies about V that goes back years:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20765490
My advice is - check out the language and make up your own mind. In the end this is a tool, not a football club.
> V promised a lot of stuff as ready but has undelivered most of them
This is wrong. V has an online playground, a package manager, hot code reloading and a REPL whereas Zig doesn't even though Zig is twice as old.
> If V was truthful like Zig, it would be able to create a foundation
Raising money doesn't lead to adoption, though. By this logic, C isn't truthful either since it doesn't have a foundation.
> Also a programming language will never be able to substitute another one if it is not able to call its vast number of libraries
How is this relevant? Both Zig and V can call C code and leverage C's ecosystem of libraries.
I wouldn't call Zig established, though. Zig's compiler still crashes on valid code and compared to V it still doesn't have an online playground, a package manager, hot code reloading, a REPL, etc. even though it's twice as old.
V's syntax is similar to Go. However under the hood V differs from Go. For example:
- V has compile-time memory management similar to the Lobster programming language.
- V has zero-cost interoperability with C.
Check it out and decide for yourself. If you already know Go, you can learn V in an afternoon.
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33337381 (posted from a 12-year-old account)
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33333904 (posted from a 2-year-old account)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33331549
I don't mind languages getting hyped but seeing posts every week on the front page of HN about an unstable esoteric language with 0 adoption - yes, it's getting tiring.
I'm subscribed to daily newsletters on The Washington Post, Bloomberg and The BBC News. This is how I stay in the loop.
I also get instant notifications for breaking news (e.g. when the latest prime minister of the UK resigned).
Very rarely now I manually visit news websites.
I haven't used social media (Facebook, Twitter) for years. If I want to share something with someone, I use instant messaging.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33374770
It's already got ~1,600 comments.
It made me realize it's not companies I would like to be working at but people I would like to be working with.